Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - definite charge - as regards the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 20, 2019

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - definite charge - as regards the certainty of charge is concern, since the penalty was initiated in respect of all three additions made by the AO out of which some additions fall in the category of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income and other one falls in the category of concealment of particulars of income - Therefore, the question of definite charge does not arise - penalty sustained

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - definite charge - as regards the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 20, 2019

You may also like:

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - unaccounted purchases - Even if the AO was not certain about the charge at the time of initiation of the penalty proceedings but he has given a...

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - addition was confirmed by CIT(A) and ITAT, Thus, there is no dispute with regard to the concealment of income and furnishing of inaccurate...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when we examine penalty levied on account of salary disallowance AO has merely made adhoc addition by way of guess work and the AO has not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notice issued under Section 142(1) - if the assessee really had no connection with the Swiss Bank accounts,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non specification of clear charge - undisclosed unsold inventory - Notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Act was issued without striking off...

Quick Updates: