Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the ...

Commissioner (Appeals) Wrongly Reduced Penalty to 25% Without Required Payment u/s 78(1) of Finance Act, 1994.

June 27, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to pay ST along with interest and deposits the 25% of penalty within a period of one month from the date of issue of determining order - Commissioner (Appeals) erred in reducing penalty at 25% from 100% of the ST demand without payment of the same

View Source

← Previous Next →

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the ...

Commissioner (Appeals) Wrongly Reduced Penalty to 25% Without Required Payment u/s 78(1) of Finance Act, 1994.

June 27, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

The case involved a dispute regarding the entitlement to a reduced penalty under the second proviso to Section 78(1) of the Finance Act 1994. The appellant had not...

Benefit of reduced penalty u/s 78 - the appellant had failed to deposit 25% of the imposed penalty before the issuance of show cause notice or within 30 days of...

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

Whether penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be reduced to 25% by invoking the provisions of first proviso to Section 78, when the assessee has...

Default in payment of service tax - Benefit of reduced penalty u/s 78 - the major demand amount already stands paid by them - the Appellant is entitled to pay reduced...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Quantum of penalty u/s 114 of CA - Power of Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty - It is not the case that penalties imposed under the provisions is a mandatory...

Levy of penalty at reduced rate of 25% of tax - assessee sought full waiver - The authority has used his discretionary power, which he is empowered u/s 78- The reduction...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Waiver of penalty is pleaded as the penalty under Section 78 ibid has been imposed and for an option to pay 25% (reduced) mandatory penalty under Section 78 ibid as the...

Inasmuch as a penalty under Section 78 is being sustained, there is no justification for restoring the penalty under Section 76 as sought for by the department. However,...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

Reduction in the quantum of penalty imposed u/s 78 - Unless the penalty under Section 78 of the Act itself is leviable on the Assessee, there is no question of any...

Levy of Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - The assessee/appellant has the option to deposit the balance service tax together with accumulated interest and penalty...

Quick Updates: