Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2019 Year 2019 This

Revision u/s 263 - in original assessment AO estimated net ...


CIT justified in revising AO's assessment u/s 263; focuses on unsecured loans not in original appeal.

June 28, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Revision u/s 263 - in original assessment AO estimated net profit @ 7% which was reduced by CIT(A) @ 5% - It is not in dispute that issue on which the remand order was passed in purported exercise of powers vested in the CIT u/s 263 i.e. unsecured loans/creditors, was not a subject matter of appeal - revision justified

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. u/s 263, the AO had not made any addition regarding cash deposits in the assessee company's bank account and unsecured loan received during the year under consideration,...

  2. Revision u/s 263 - during the course of assessment, the AO made an addition on account of unexplained cash credit of unsecured loan u/s 68 - AO omitted to disallow the...

  3. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) had specifically called for and considered information regarding unsecured loans during the original assessment...

  4. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - Directions of the Ld.CIT given to the AO to verify the unsecured creditors, unsecured loans, the AO in his fresh assessment order passed u/s 143(3)...

  6. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  7. Revision u/s 263 - Order of the AO in respect of unsecured loans, sundry creditors/liabilities and sundry debtors accepted by the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the...

  8. CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

  9. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO has not even made minimum exercise for ascertaining the unsecured loans accepted during the year, under consideration...

  10. The assessee, a university, claimed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) for the relevant assessment year, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO) after considering the...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal regarding the revision u/s 263 concerning unsecured loans received. The Principal Commissioner found that the...

  12. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - unexplained credit - The Tribunal meticulously examined the submissions, the audit objections, and the law's provisions. It...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - amount of HUF was deposited not in the account of the HUF but into the account of the individual - CIT has enquired before invoking the provisions of...

  14. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - inadequate v/s no enquiry - unsecured loan, difference in stock and late payment of PF & ESI - The Tribunal reviewed each of the contested...

  15. ITAT upheld revision under s.263 finding assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. Assessee failed to establish loan genuineness and lenders'...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates