Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of interest u/s 43B - ...

No Penalty Imposed: Adequate Disclosures and Loss Incurred u/ss 271(1)(c) and 43B Justify No Tax Advantage.

June 28, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of interest u/s 43B - assessee has made sufficient disclosures in the financial statements and furthermore it should not be penalized on account of the mistake committed by the CA - there was no immediate tax benefit to the assessee by not disallowing the interest expenses since there was loss - no penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of interest u/s 43B - ...

No Penalty Imposed: Adequate Disclosures and Loss Incurred u/ss 271(1)(c) and 43B Justify No Tax Advantage.

June 28, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271 AAB or u/s 271 (1)(c) - concealment on income - as per clause (2) of section 271AAB, no penalty under the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of...

Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in case of voluntary surrender of income - disallowance of claim of loss - Assessee offered the loss voluntarily to avoid litigation and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Quick Updates: