Refund claim - mere admission of an appeal would not by itself ...

Appeal Admission Doesn't Halt Tribunal Order; Respondents Can Receive Benefits Despite Appeal. No Stay on Refund.

August 9, 2019

Case Laws Customs HC

Refund claim - mere admission of an appeal would not by itself lead to the stay of the order being appealed against before this Court, it only indicates that the issue raised in the appeal requires consideration and does not denying the benefits available to the respondents by virtue of the impugned order of the Tribunal - no stay for refund

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - mere admission of an appeal would not by itself ...

Appeal Admission Doesn't Halt Tribunal Order; Respondents Can Receive Benefits Despite Appeal. No Stay on Refund.

August 9, 2019

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Entitlement of Interest on delayed refund - relevant date for calculation of time - In the present case, refund arises only after passing of order-in-appeal by the...

Refund of Service Tax - time limitation - Exercise of power u/s 142(3) of GST Act for refund of service tax - The case involves the rejection of a refund claim by the...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

The case involves timeliness of appeal filed u/s 85(3A) of Finance Act, 1994 before Commissioner (Appeals-II) and refund claim. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

CESTAT dismissed appeal concerning refund claim of unutilized Cenvat Credit under s.142(3) of CGST Act, read with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules and s.11B of Central...

The case involved a claim for refund of interest u/s 72 of Finance Act, 2010 to benefit from a retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of CCR, 2002/2004. The Tribunal held...

Refund of Service tax paid - time limitation - The Appellate Tribunal examined the submissions and found that the appellant had self-assessed and paid service tax...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

Admission of Section 7 Application - CIRP - The case involved an appeal by a suspended director of a corporate debtor against the admission of a Section 7 application by...

Grant of interest in respect of the refund claim already granted - Revenue’s contention is that they have granted the refund within three months form the date of...

Refund of excise duty paid - denial on the ground of time limitation - The Commissioner (Appeals) has wrongly invoked the provision of Clause (ec) for denying the refund...

The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the original authority to process the refund claims after providing an opportunity of hearing to the appellant....

Quick Updates: