Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2019 Year 2019 This

Refusal to supply documents seized - A mere statement that it ...


Authorities Must Provide Seized Document Copies; Claims of Prejudice Need Substantial Reasons; Affected Parties Need No Justification.

August 27, 2019

Case Laws     GST     HC

Refusal to supply documents seized - A mere statement that it will prejudicially affect the investigation would be only chanting the language of the section, there must be cogent reasons to withhold giving of copies and the said person need not give justification why he needs the copies of the documents seized - If the right to get copies of the documents and the power of the authorities to refuse the same has to be balanced - refusal unjustified

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Principles of Natural Justice - denial of supply of copies/extracts of the seized documents - Once it is held that discretion available to the competent authority u/S....

  2. Validity of assessment order - copy of the SIB report not provided to the assessee - The court held that the petitioner's version was not considered by the authorities...

  3. Direction to the respondents to issue copies of the seized documents - the respondents shall permit the petitioners to take copies of those documents relied upon in the...

  4. Search and seizure operations conducted by respondent No. 3 on petitioner-Company's sister entity premises, seizing material like sales registers, accounts books, and...

  5. Violation of principles of natural justice occurred due to non-receipt of show cause notice (SCN). Petitioner disputed receiving SCN, repeatedly mentioned non-receipt,...

  6. The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed the Respondent to release the original documents seized from the Petitioner's premises within 30 days of issuing the show cause...

  7. Proceeds of crime money laundering case. Respondent Enforcement Directorate permitted to retain/seize/freeze seized documents, digital records, bank accounts from...

  8. Levy of penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - When the authority wants to rely upon such documents, it is incumbent upon them to provide copy of such...

  9. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  10. Rejection of Refund claim - Whether the service provided by the appellant to GSPHCL is service provided to a governmental authority? - The GSPHCL is a 100% owned by...

  11. Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

  12. Seeking copies of documents seized u/s 67(2) of the CGST Act and copy of statement recorded - assessee made written request to provide copies - department directed to...

  13. Seizure of documents, books, laptops, CPUs, mobile phones permissible u/s 67(2) CGST Act but must be returned within 30 days of issuing notice as per Section 67(3)...

  14. Scope of SCN - Presumption with regards to documents seized - In view of Section 36A of Central Excise Act, 1944 it is only when such document is tendered in evidence...

  15. The petitioner challenged the order imposing tax liability and penalty for wrongful availment of CENVAT credit, alleging violation of principles of natural justice and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates