Proceedings u/s 179 - AO held that the petitioner(director) is ...

Director Held Liable for Company Tax u/s 179; Directed to File Revision u/s 264 for Remedy.

August 28, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Proceedings u/s 179 - AO held that the petitioner(director) is jointly and severally liable towards the tax/penalty imposed on company - a perusal of Section 264 makes it clear that writ petitioner has an effective and efficacious alternate remedy as the Revisional Authority has powers to pass orders which are not prejudicial to the assessee by revising the impugned order - directed to file revision

View Source

← Previous Next →

Proceedings u/s 179 - AO held that the petitioner(director) is ...

Director Held Liable for Company Tax u/s 179; Directed to File Revision u/s 264 for Remedy.

August 28, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Maintainability of wrt petition before HC where option for filing Revision u/s 264 is available - Rejection of Refund of excess amount paid as tax - There are no...

Legal provisions and remedies available to the Assessing Officer (AO) when dealing with a company whose name has been struck off from the register of companies. Key...

Revision u/s 264 - Scope of revision under section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be abused as a substitute to get over an order of assessment passed second...

The High Court held that the petitioner, a Director in the Government of Meghalaya's Department of Soil, who claimed exemption from income tax u/s 10(26) as a member of...

Revision u/s 264 - Claiming benefit of DTAA - refund of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) which was paid wrongly - This was not a case where a deduction was made u/s 195...

Section 264 empowers Commissioner to revise assessment order to provide relief to assessee in cases of over-assessment, even if assessee did not file revised return....

Company struck off from Register of Companies u/s 248(5) of Companies Act, 2013. Section 250 interpreted using golden rule of construction, allowing struck-off company...

Revision petition u/s. 264 - disallowance of carry forward of loss to subsequent years - CIT while disposing of the 264 petition of the assessee, had clearly directed...

Revision of other orders u/s 264 - petitioners sought to expressly withdraw the revision petition filed u/s 264 - application was pending for decision - Thus by not...

The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust...

Revision Petition filed u/s 264 of the order passed by AO u/s 270AA(4) - The provision does not provide for any bar or prohibition against the assessee challenging an...

Striking off the Company which was a Private Company, from the Register of Companies, indisputably does not absolve its erstwhile Directors who are liable as provided...

HC allowed the writ petition challenging Commissioner's order under Section 264. Prior amendment of Return of Income was not mandatory before filing revision application....

Addition of protective assessment - CIT (A) has clearly mentioned that the impugned amount related to the company and the protective addition was solely u/s 179 of the...

Recovery of dues u/s 179(1) - seeking recovery of unpaid tax of the said company and penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act of the same company from the director - A...

Quick Updates: