Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (b) and 114AA On CHA - there is ...

Customs House Agent Cleared of Penalties Due to Lack of Evidence for Intent u/ss 112(b) and 114AA.

November 2, 2019

Case Laws Customs HC

Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (b) and 114AA On CHA - there is no element of mens rea or conscious knowledge which can be attributed to the CHA - CHA acted bona fide and merely facilitated the imports on the strength of the documents which were handed over to him by the importer -There is no sufficient material to impose penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (b) and 114AA On CHA - there is ...

Customs House Agent Cleared of Penalties Due to Lack of Evidence for Intent u/ss 112(b) and 114AA.

November 2, 2019

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Imposition of penalties on the appellants u/ss 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The adjudicating authority failed to consider the appellants' request for...

The case involved valuation of imported goods, undervaluation, admissibility of appellant's statement u/s 108, documentary evidence, computer printouts u/s 138C,...

CESTAT ruled in favor of delivery agents, setting aside penalties u/ss 112(a) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962. The agents, who handled a sealed FCL container from Jebel...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Importation of an old and used car by misdeclaring it as new, resulting in undervaluation. Imposition of composite penalty u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs...

Appellant's penalties u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 set aside. Reliance solely on co-accused statements without corroborative evidence found...

Penalty levied u/s 112(b) of Customs Act challenged due to lack of proper evidence. Appellant obtained PNR movement documents from steamer agent for cargo movement from...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abetment in undervaluation - evasion of Customs Duty by several syndicates of crane...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not...

Customs case involving alleged undervaluation of imported goods and demand of illegal gratification by a Customs officer. The Tribunal found the statements of co-accused...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

The case involved a penalty u/s 112(B) of the Customs Act, 1962 against an employee of a Customs House Agent (CHA) for allegedly concealing information affecting a bill...

The case involved penalties u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act for smuggling foreign gold. The tribunal held that statements without cross-examination are...

Quick Updates: