Clandestine removal - Shortage of total production - discrepancy ...

Appellant Justifies 0.31% Production Discrepancy; Central Excise Duty Demand Overruled by Tribunal.

November 4, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - Shortage of total production - discrepancy consist of only 0.31% - appellant has been able to show that plausible reason of the discrepancy and also the fact that there is no gain to be made by clandestine clearance in terms of Central Excise Duty - demand set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - Shortage of total production - discrepancy ...

Appellant Justifies 0.31% Production Discrepancy; Central Excise Duty Demand Overruled by Tribunal.

November 4, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

The appellant paid excise duty on the removal of inputs as such, based on the transaction value. However, this excise duty was found to be in excess of the actual CENVAT...

Demand of duty u/s 11D of the Central Excise Act 1944 - SSI units - price is inclusive of duty of excise - Since the appellant has not collected the Excise duty from the...

Levy of Central Excise duty - intermediate goods used in the manufacture of exempt final goods - the duty liability would fall on the manufacturer who is a job worker in...

Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Short payment of Central Excise Duty - The Appellate Tribunal concluded that central excise duty is leviable only on excisable goods manufactured or produced in India,...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Closure of their factory due to disconnection of power supply - demand of central excise duty - power connection of the appellant unit was never restored during the...

Refund of Excise duty paid under protest - it was obligatory on the part of Central Excise Officer to have issued a notice to the appellant for payment of the short paid...

Demand of differential Central Excise Duty with interest and penalty - inflating freight charges through their dummy transport unit - The Tribunal affirmed the...

100% EOU - extended period of limitation - while demanding duty was not sure of the provision of law under which the same had to be demanded and even the penalty has...

SSI Exemption - value of clearances - clubbing of clearances - The tribunal found the appellants engaged in the manufacture and sale of excisable goods without Central...

Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a...

Quick Updates: