Rebate claim - description of goods in ARE-1 and excise invoices ...

Case Laws Central Excise

December 12, 2019

Rebate claim - description of goods in ARE-1 and excise invoices do not tally with the description in the shipping bills - Whenever the assessee claims rebate, the primary and foremost consideration is the identity of goods and the onus to prove the same lies on the claimant.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rebate claim - description of goods in ARE-1 and excise invoices ...

Case Laws Central Excise

December 12, 2019

You may also like:

The Public Notice issued by the Office of Principal Commissioner of Customs addresses the issue of IGST refunds on exports that remain unprocessed due to SB005 error,...

Refund of the Additional Duty of Customs (SAD) - rejection of refund on the ground that the description of the imported goods and the goods sold in India does not tally...

Rebate claim - Cenvat credit reversed on depreciated value of imported capital goods (machinery parts) at the time of their export - Since the imported goods are not...

Adjustment of refund claim (rebate claim on export of goods) with demand stayed by the CESTAT

Initiation of CIRP u/s 9 - time limitation - threshold limit of amount claimed - With respect to 234 invoices, which are payable within 30 days of the invoices, 224...

Rebate claim – Non-submission of original and duplicate copy of ARE-1 under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 r.w Notification No. 19/2004 - rebate denied - CGOVT

Rebate Claim - In the present case, the goods were removed for export on payment of Central Excise duty on 22-6-2017 (i.e. not earlier than six months from 1-7-2017) and...

The petitioners' rebate claim for export of goods was rejected and penalty imposed u/s 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rules 25 and 27 of the Central...

The High Court held that the petitioner's failure to file the declaration and Form ARE-2 should not result in rejection of the rebate claim, as the buses were...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Denial of rebate claim - Bar of limitation - Export of goods - Petitioner's claim for refund would be governed by rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with the...

Rebate claim - discrepancies in the declared gross weight and net weight in there ARE-1s - shipping Bill was not appended with the rebate claim - decided in favor of...

Rebate claim is not admissible if the original and duplicate copy of ARE-1 is not submitted along with rebate claim. - CGOVT

Revision application - rebate sanctioning authority - rebate claims under the provisions of Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Deputy Commissioner/Assistant...

Refund of excess paid excise duty - It is clear from these documents that the appellant has not claimed rebate on these invoices. They have also furnished the...

Quick Updates: