Obviously the report obtained by the Revenue Authorities from ...

Tribunal Upholds Revenue Authorities' 2009 Report Over Assessee's; Denies Retesting Request After Nine Years.

December 21, 2019

Case Laws Customs HC

Obviously the report obtained by the Revenue Authorities from the sample taken from the confiscated export goods vide Report dated 16.10.2009, was more reliable rather than the Report dated 22.10.2009 produced by the Assessee. - Rejection of the prayer by the learned Tribunal for retesting of the sample in question, especially after a long period of about 9 years was justified

View Source

← Previous Next →

Obviously the report obtained by the Revenue Authorities from ...

Tribunal Upholds Revenue Authorities' 2009 Report Over Assessee's; Denies Retesting Request After Nine Years.

December 21, 2019

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

The CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the determination of export duty on exported iron ore fines. The Tribunal held that the iron content, prior to the...

Taxability of income in India - Income attributable to India - income of advertisement and subscription revenue - Permanent Establishment (PE) - business connection -...

The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments, focusing on royalty, management fees, and IT allocation costs. The tribunal upheld the use of the...

Tribunal found assessee had reasonable cause for delay in furnishing Tax Audit Report due to delay in finalization of statutory audit arising from dispute between Board...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees...

The assessee had not obtained and furnished the Audit Report from the Accountant within the due date. The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty u/s 271B is not...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of classifying imported Zinc as unwrought/unrefined under a specific customs tariff heading. The Tribunal rejected the demand...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two main issues: 1. Addition u/s 37(1) - Assessee incurred business loss due to default in property payment, allowed as revenue loss. 2....

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) rejected the assessee's plea challenging the validity of proceedings u/s 153C and upheld their validity. The authorities below...

Levy of penalty under Section 27(3)/27(4) of TNVAT Act - Any alleged admission before the Inspecting Authority cannot be put against the assessee because the Assessing...

Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - illegal export by resorting to gross mis-declaration about the ‘Fe’ content - It is seen that the Test Report itself was...

Addition made towards receipt Assignment of Fee - Assessee has withdrawn amount from Escrow account and utilized for its business purpose - Although, there is a timing...

Quick Updates: