Addition u/s.69C - unexplained expenditure - Admittedly, in the ...

Assessing Officer Cannot Add Unexplained Expenditure u/s 69C in Later Proceedings if Initially Omitted.

January 11, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s.69C - unexplained expenditure - Admittedly, in the first round of proceedings, there was no addition made u/s. 69C by the revenue. AO could not have made any addition u/s. 69C in the second round of proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s.69C - unexplained expenditure - Admittedly, in the ...

Assessing Officer Cannot Add Unexplained Expenditure u/s 69C in Later Proceedings if Initially Omitted.

January 11, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee's reconciliation explained total purchases, including capital goods and purchase returns, tallying with recorded purchases. The Tribunal correctly held that...

The ITAT held that once the source of cash is taxed, it cannot be further taxed as unexplained cash expenditure in the hands of the assessee company. The assessee had...

Additions made u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure – Whether the Assessing Officer had acted on conjectures and surmises – Held no, additions confirmed - HC

Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Unexplained purchase u/s 69C - Section 69C clearly refers to the “source of the expenditure” and not to the expenditure itself - AT

The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - once estimation of GP has been made on the unaccounted sales it covers unexplained expenditure also to this extent - AT

The High Court held that once a proper officer initiates proceedings on a subject matter under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or the Haryana...

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - The High Court found that the Assessing Officer's reliance on cumulative figures provided by CBIC, without specifying the individual...

Addition u/s 69C - CIT(A) confined the addition to only 5% of the amount spent on purchases based on past record of profits - as the provision of Section 69C is not...

The key points are: The Assessing Officer (AO) erroneously applied Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, which deals with unexplained expenditure, to transactions involving...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

Unexplained salary - search and seizure proceedings - The addition made by the Assessing Officer as relates to unaccounted salary does not sustain in the eyes of law as...

Quick Updates: