Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the ...

Taxpayer's Revision Request Denied; CIT Upholds Assessment Order for Cash Payment Violations u/s 40A(3.

January 22, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the application on the ground that, the assessee has filed application only against the order of assessment - Additions towards cash payment in violation of section 40A(3) in the reassessment proceedings - order of CIT sustained.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the ...

Taxpayer's Revision Request Denied; CIT Upholds Assessment Order for Cash Payment Violations u/s 40A(3.

January 22, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Disallowance of cash payments in excess of prescribed limit u/s. 40A(3) - even though few payments is covered u/s. 40A(3) of the Act, because of peculiar nature of...

Disallowance of freight expenditure u/s 40A(3) paid in Cash - As enhanced limit of ₹ 35,000/- is applicable for the payment to the transport operators and in other...

Revision u/s 263 - Cash payments towards purchase of capital goods - Violation of the provisions of section 40A(3) - PCIT himself could have examined the impugned...

Invocation of section 40A(3) - Octroi was paid to the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation – Cash payment - payment does not come within the provisions of section 40A(3) read...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - payment in case for purchase of recharge vouchers from Tata Teleservices Limited - payments were genuine - rigors of section 40A(3) / Rule 6DD...

Mere disallowance of expenses u/s 40A(3) would not invite penalty for concealing or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Assessee disclosed all particulars...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - transactions and payments made in cash - assessee filed affidavits from sub-contractors of assessee firm and they insisted for cash payments to...

Disallowance u/s.40A(3) - expenses towards air ticket and hotel expenses in cash in excess of prescribed limit u/s.40A(3) - there is merit in arguments of the assessee...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - addition u/s 40A ignored by AO - expenses have been incurred in cash exceeding Rs. 20,000/- per day - AO is expected to examine the provisions...

Addition u/s 40A(3) - Payment not made in cash but paid to third parties on behalf of supplier of goods – AO was not justified in invoking the section 40A(3) - AT

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - cash payment - There is no case of addition of section 40A(3) with regard to purchases that were made on account of capital items - AT

Addition u/s 40A(3) - Payments made otherwise than by an account payee cheque - It is admitted case of assessee that to one of the parties even payments were made by...

Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment in excess of prescribed limit - Genuineness or otherwise of payment is not a criteria to exclude cash payment in excess of prescribed...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - cash payments to lorry drivers - The payments is supported by ledger account of transport operators on whose behalf the payment were made to...

Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payments in excess of the limit prescribed - each payment, on each day to each person was less than ₹ 20,000/- in cash - There were both...

Quick Updates: