Deduction u/s 80IA(2)(iv)(c) - we do not agree with the view ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 29, 2020

Deduction u/s 80IA(2)(iv)(c) - we do not agree with the view taken by the Honb’le High Court of Rajasthan insofar as it takes a view that once the area declared as backward area under Section 80HH(2) of the Act, the same has to be taken as Industrially Backward Area for the purposes of the Act, as Section 80HH(2) and 80-IA(2)(iv)(c) are separate and independent provisions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Deduction u/s 80IA(2)(iv)(c) - we do not agree with the view ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 29, 2020

You may also like:

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - deduction u/s. 10A - View taken by the Ld. AO in the proceedings initiated u/s. 154 tantamount to a change in view resulting into...

Deduction claimed u/s 80IA(4)(iv)(c) - There is no requirement of capitalization of expenditure on renovation and modernization in the books of accounts is condition...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT is incorrect in coming to the conclusion that Assessing Officer has not examined the issue and applied his mind insofar as investments in fixed...

Deduction of interest from rental income - loan was taken for the purpose of construction of house property - looking to the fact that the assessee took a housing loan...

Disallowance of claim of deduction @ 50% u/s 57(iv) - interest received on enhanced compensation - on the basis of the overriding provision of Section 56(2)(viii) read...

Deduction u/s.80IA(4) - the contractor, who undertakes for road Widening of the National Highways from 2 lines to 4 lines, is eligible for deduction u/s 80IA(4) - AT

Deduction u/s 80IA - ICD - Inland port - infrastructure facilities - deduction allowed - HC

Revision u/s 263 - When the order of the AO suffers from a complete lack of enquiry, then the above said principle has no application due to the obvious reason that the...

Revision u/s 263 - When the AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has resulted in loss to the revenue, or where two views are possible and the AO has...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - if the AO has adopted one of the two or more courses permissible in law and it has resulted in loss of revenue, or where two views are possible...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

Deduction u/s 80IA - the scope of deduction under Section 80IA of the Act is limited to determination of quantum of deduction by treating eligible business as the only...

The High Court set aside the order u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, finding that the authority took a restrictive and conservative approach in not noticing the Central Board of...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - Purchase of property below circle rate / stamp value - since the assessee/co-owners has made part payment (part consideration of Rs. 3...

Quick Updates: