CIRP process - We are not convinced with the argument that ...

Court Upholds COC's 66% Majority Rule; All Creditors Share Interim Finance Duties u/s 30(4).

February 3, 2020

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

CIRP process - We are not convinced with the argument that amended Sub-Section (4) of Section 30 requires only Secured Financial Creditors to contribute towards interim finance and not the Unsecured Financial Creditors. No such interpretation can be drawn. We will not interfere in the collective decision of COC in this regard - The dissenting Financial Creditor in COC cannot be allowed to scuttle CIRP process otherwise the provision permitting COC to take decisions with regard to subjects stated in Section 28(1) by given majority of 66% under Section 28(3) would be rendered nugatory.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIRP process - We are not convinced with the argument that ...

Court Upholds COC's 66% Majority Rule; All Creditors Share Interim Finance Duties u/s 30(4).

February 3, 2020

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

You may also like:

The High Court declined to grant interim relief, emphasizing that the amended writ petition raised numerous complex grounds which cannot be adjudicated fully at the...

The court upheld the approval of the resolution plan, rejecting the wrongful allocation of Rs. 79 lakhs as the liquidation value. The Supreme Court's decision in Amit...

Reduction of issued, subscribed, and paid-up equity share capital u/s 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. Compliance with Sections 66(1), 66(2), and 66(3) satisfied....

Corporate Debtor, going concern or not - interim funds to run the concern - On going through Section 28(1)(a), Section 28(3) and Section 28(4), it is clear that the...

FINANCE BILL, 2013 passed by the Loksabha as on 30-4-2013

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

Constitution of Committee of Creditors (COC) - 66% needed for CIRP - as per Section 21(2) of IBC, 2016, COC shall comprise of all financial creditors and must be...

Levy of customs duty on import of wheat - rate of duty increased from 20% to 30%

Levy of stamp duty on schemes of amalgamation or restructuring - The High court found that orders of the court sanctioning amalgamation/restructuring, along with the...

Resolution plan approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) with 97.54% vote share. Commercial wisdom of CoC in approving resolution plan not to be lightly interfered with....

Time period for DIN-4 for PAN has been extended upto 15.12.2011. - Cir. No. 66/2011 Dated: October 4, 2011

Replacement of the Resolution Professional - The decision taken by the CoC is a decision by vote of 66% and when the decision is by votes of a collective body, the...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

The summary focuses on the approval of a resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the limited scope of judicial review by the adjudicating authority. The...

NCLAT upheld CoC's discretion in approving resolution plan based on security interest rather than vote share of financial creditors. The tribunal confirmed that...

Quick Updates: