CIRP process - We are not convinced with the argument that ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

February 3, 2020

CIRP process - We are not convinced with the argument that amended Sub-Section (4) of Section 30 requires only Secured Financial Creditors to contribute towards interim finance and not the Unsecured Financial Creditors. No such interpretation can be drawn. We will not interfere in the collective decision of COC in this regard - The dissenting Financial Creditor in COC cannot be allowed to scuttle CIRP process otherwise the provision permitting COC to take decisions with regard to subjects stated in Section 28(1) by given majority of 66% under Section 28(3) would be rendered nugatory.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIRP process - We are not convinced with the argument that ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

February 3, 2020

You may also like:

Liability to contribute towards Liquidation Process Costs - scope of Financial Institution - The Tribunal found that the appellant, having invested a significant sum by...

Threshold limit for triggering CIRP - Validity of Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Initiation of CIRP by Financial Creditors - The statute i.e.,...

CIRP - Completion of Real estate project during the Proceedings - Appellant filed an application seeking permission for unsecured and secured financial creditors to vote...

CIRP - discrimination against secured creditor - The Appellant a ‘Secured Financial Creditor’ has been discriminated with other ‘Secured Financial Creditors’, we hold...

Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to adjudicate upon a closure notice issued prior to the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...

The NCLAT addressed issues regarding the approval of a Resolution Plan by Suraksha Realty Limited, focusing on the treatment of claims filed in the CIRP of the Corporate...

Admission of section 7 application - financial debt or not - The Tribunal affirmed that the disbursal of ₹5 crores to the corporate debtor by the financial...

The NCLAT upheld the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor (Respondent No.1) for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It held...

During The Financial Year 2012-13 - Tax-Free, Secured, Redeemable, Non-Convertible Bonds - Notification

Initiation of CIRP - threshold limit for triggering CIRP - joint application - The statute i.e., Section 7 of the IBC as amended vide Gazette Notification dated...

CIRP - The NCLAT upheld the decision to reject inflated claims by the financial creditor, Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund (SASF), and supported the termination of the...

Withdrawal from CIRP on the ground that the Applicant is in the process of re-structuring the debt of the Corporate Debtor - As a matter of fact, in this case no...

Liquidation of company - It must be borne in mind that the IBC treats the CIRP and Liquidation process as two separate stages and the proof of claim is to be filed...

Interpretation of Regulation 21A of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 regarding secured creditor's obligation to realize security interest within stipulated...

Liquidation process - right of the secured creditor - Respondent can realise a Security Interest as per provision Section 13(9) of the SARFAESI Act. Since the Respondent...

Quick Updates: