Restoring the issue of levy of penalty to the file of AO - ...

Assessing Officer Can Restore Penalty Levy; Section 275(1A) Limitations Don't Apply, ITAT Authority Questioned.

September 6, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Restoring the issue of levy of penalty to the file of AO - whether ITAT has such powers? - apprehension that any order in the penalty proceedings may be barred by limitation under section 275(1A), is not well founded. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Restoring the issue of levy of penalty to the file of AO - ...

Assessing Officer Can Restore Penalty Levy; Section 275(1A) Limitations Don't Apply, ITAT Authority Questioned.

September 6, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Penalty u/s 270A was imposed by disallowing 30% of indexed cost of development expenses concerning Long Term Capital Gain offered by the assessee due to failure to...

The case deals with the limitation period for initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271E of the Income Tax Act. It is well-established that the limitation period commences...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Penalty u/s 271B - Tax Audit - delay in getting the books of accounts audited and furnishing the same - period of limitation for passing penalty orders - the levy of...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that when the valuation officer fails to submit the valuation report within a reasonable time, the assessing officer cannot...

The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

Deduction u/s.35 AD(5)(aa) - whole of capital expenditure incurred for purpose of development of hotel claimed - We restore the issue to file of the Assessing Officer...

Quick Updates: