The question of penalty proceedings would arise only when there ...

Penalties Apply Only if Valid Recovery u/s 73(1) Initiates; Section 80 Excludes Section 73 from 'Non Obstante' Clause.

September 10, 2012

Case Laws Service Tax HC

The question of penalty proceedings would arise only when there could be valid recovery proceedings under Section 73(1) of the Act. That is the reason when the ‘non obstante’ clause in Section 80 refers to only Sections 76, 77 and 78 and not to Section 73 of the Act. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

The question of penalty proceedings would arise only when there ...

Penalties Apply Only if Valid Recovery u/s 73(1) Initiates; Section 80 Excludes Section 73 from 'Non Obstante' Clause.

September 10, 2012

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

The HC quashed the impugned order dated 14.12.2023 for violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent failed to issue a proper and prior show cause notice...

The High Court examined the legality of penalty imposition u/s 74(1) and 74(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 for wrongly availed but unutilized Input Tax Credit. The petitioner...

The HC held that the Summary of Show Cause Notice (SCN) along with the attachment containing tax determination cannot be considered a valid initiation of proceedings u/s...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Penalty u/s 271 AAB or u/s 271 (1)(c) - concealment on income - as per clause (2) of section 271AAB, no penalty under the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of...

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

HC invalidated tax determination order due to procedural non-compliance with AGST Act 2017. Authority failed to issue proper Show Cause Notice (SCN) under Section 73(1),...

HC held that issuance of only a Summary Show Cause Notice (SCN) in Form GST DRC-01 violates natural justice principles and fails to comply with Section 73(1) of AGST...

HC quashed the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 due to procedural non-compliance with Section 73 of AGST Act, 2017. The authority failed to issue a proper Show Cause...

HC held that summary show cause notice (SCN) in Form GST DRC-01 cannot substitute proper SCN under Section 73(1) of AGST Act, 2017. The impugned order was quashed as it...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) was not legally valid. The Assessing Officer failed to...

The High Court held that the Summary of the Show Cause Notice along with the attachment containing the determination of tax cannot be considered a valid initiation of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

The HC stayed the impugned order invoking Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of short paid tax due to discrepancy between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, holding that...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Quick Updates: