Imposition of penalty u/s 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 8, 2020

Imposition of penalty u/s 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules 1944 in remand proceedings - The order of dropping penalty was never challenged in any subsequent proceedings.. Therefore, in remand proceedings for third party, penalty cannot be imposed on the appellant. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 8, 2020

You may also like:

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Confiscation of land, buildings etc. - invocation of powers under Rule 173(Q)(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on 26.03.2007 and 29.03.2007 for confiscation of land,...

Demand of excise duty and penalty – recovery of dues from the auction purchaser unit in terms of Rule 230(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - recovery proceedings dropped - HC

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

Levy of penalty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 - duty liability from January 2009 onwards was being discharged on lower values by applying appropriate rate of duty...

Recovery of confirmed dues and penalties - section 35 F of Central Excise Act, 1944, read with section 35C (2A) of Central Excise Act, 1944 and with rule 41 of Customs...

Levy of equal amount of penalty imposed under the provisions of Rule 25(1)(d) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 -...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - time limitation - Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules itself clearly specifying that such refund claims would be subject to “such safeguards,...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

100% EOU - served from India scheme (SFIS) - Recovery of duties of customs foregone - There is no finding in the order of the original authority holding the goods liable...

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Wrong Quotation of Penalty Provision in the SCN – The imposition of penalty under Rule 15 (2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise...

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

Quick Updates: