Imposition of penalty u/s 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise ...

Penalty u/s 209A Cannot Be Re-Imposed on Appellant After Uncontested Order Dropped Initial Penalty.

April 8, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules 1944 in remand proceedings - The order of dropping penalty was never challenged in any subsequent proceedings.. Therefore, in remand proceedings for third party, penalty cannot be imposed on the appellant. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise ...

Penalty u/s 209A Cannot Be Re-Imposed on Appellant After Uncontested Order Dropped Initial Penalty.

April 8, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The High Court quashed the penalty imposed u/s 270A, holding that the foundation for penalty proceedings was extinguished due to the subsequent rectification order. The...

Levying penalty u/s 272A(1) - non-compliance of the notice - Nonappearance of the assessee in response to the initial notice under section 142(1) of the Act was not...

Imposition of penalty u/r 209A of CER on Directors - The authorized signatory and Director has stated that the material was purchased through broker was “on for” basis...

Imposition of penalty - Clandestine removal of goods - Merely because he was the General Manager for a limited period, cannot make him liable to penalty under Rule 209A...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Section 129 of CGST Act constitutes statutory penalty provision overriding others, but cannot override Section 126 principles of moderation for minor breaches. HC held...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition of capital gain u/s 50C - the amount remain to be added [after deducting the initial exemption and consideration] is the only amount...

Rectification of mistake - Levy penalty u/s 271AAC or u/s 270 - No proceedings are pending before the CIT(A) - CIT (A) was not right in passing order of rectification by...

HC partially allowed the petition challenging GST late fee and penalty impositions. Court upheld late fee under Section 47(2) of GST Act for delayed annual return...

AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

Quick Updates: