Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2012 Year 2012 This

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - it is not a fit case for levy of ...


Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Deemed Inappropriate for Surrender of Additional Income; No Concealment Found.

September 17, 2012

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - it is not a fit case for levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) on the surrender of additional income - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim u/s 80C - The Tribunal found that there was a discrepancy in the application of penalties by the lower authorities. - While the...

  4. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s...

  5. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

  7. Penalty for concealment of income Under Section 271(1) (c) - Article

  8. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  9. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  10. Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

  14. The ITAT ruled that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed on additional income voluntarily disclosed by the assessee during survey proceedings and...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - While apparently surrendering all the income on its own by the Assessee ought not to have attracted penalty for concealment under Section...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates