Just to take a contrary view in favour of the Revenue, the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 1, 2020

Just to take a contrary view in favour of the Revenue, the authorities unneccesarily create a forum for litigation for the assessee by taking different and divergent views, despite there being binding precedents from the jurisdictional high Court. This tendency of the revenue authorities not to follow the judgments of superior Constitutional Courts deserves to be strongly deprecated by imposition of suitable costs on them - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Just to take a contrary view in favour of the Revenue, the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 1, 2020

You may also like:

Binding nature of Tribunal Order - Principle of “consistency” - Not only the Tribunal but all the Authorities subordinate to it are bound to follow and comply with the...

Case involved revision u/s 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) setting aside assessment order regarding rent recovered from specified persons and treatment of...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - deduction u/s. 10A - View taken by the Ld. AO in the proceedings initiated u/s. 154 tantamount to a change in view resulting into...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

Recovery of dues (secured debt) - secured creditor has priority over the right claimed by the Revenue over secured debt or not - It is quite clear and evident from...

Rectification of mistake - CCIT cannot sit as an Appellate Authority over the decision of the Appellate Tribunal. The CCIT is bound by the decision of the Appellate...

Principle of res judicata in taxation - Rate of VAT on Noodles - 4% or 12.5% - Classification - Assessing Officer being lower in rank cannot be permitted to ignore...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

Doctrine of constitutional priority - Supremecy of attachment passed by the Tax Recovery Officer / Income Tax Department or to the mortgage created in favour of the...

Rejection of appeal on the ground of time limitation - sufficient cause for delay or not - When the bank account of the petitioner is freezed by the authorities, it is a...

Denial of exemption u/s.54 - purchasing a new house in the name of the assessee’s son - The principle of following a view in favour of the assessee when contrary views...

The High Court set aside the order u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, finding that the authority took a restrictive and conservative approach in not noticing the Central Board of...

The court held that the charge created by the bank u/s 26E of the SARFAESI Act would take precedence over the charge created by the respondent u/s 48 of the VAT Act....

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Quick Updates: