Just to take a contrary view in favour of the Revenue, the ...

Authorities Criticized for Ignoring High Court Precedents, Creating Unnecessary Litigation for Taxpayers; Suggested Costs to Deter Behavior.

August 1, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Just to take a contrary view in favour of the Revenue, the authorities unneccesarily create a forum for litigation for the assessee by taking different and divergent views, despite there being binding precedents from the jurisdictional high Court. This tendency of the revenue authorities not to follow the judgments of superior Constitutional Courts deserves to be strongly deprecated by imposition of suitable costs on them - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Just to take a contrary view in favour of the Revenue, the ...

Authorities Criticized for Ignoring High Court Precedents, Creating Unnecessary Litigation for Taxpayers; Suggested Costs to Deter Behavior.

August 1, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of remanding the matter to the Assessing Authority - the first appellate authority has adjudicated the controversy on merits and therefore, the tribunal, which...

The circular addresses the Reduction of Government Litigation by setting monetary limits for filing appeals before GSTAT, High Courts, and Supreme Court. It refers to...

Revenue appeal against the pure question of facts - unnecessary litigation on the part of the Revenue Authorities - In the facts and circumstances, no disallowance was...

Adjudication of show cause notice (SCN) after several year - The tribunal noted the history of duty exemption, litigation, and subsequent duty imposition on resin...

SCN issued for cancellation of registration without detailed reasons. Held: Respondent authorities' approach commendable for complying with natural justice by giving...

PIL - alleged undeclared income - The present Public Interest Litigation is not a genuine Public Interest Litigation, but a politically motivated litigation, which...

Waiver of late fees - Bill of Entry got purged before payment of duty through IGST - filing of fresh Bill of entry due to system error - The imposition of late fee...

CESTAT Mumbai analyzed the case involving 'API supari' to determine the rate of duty and the applicability of Advance Ruling u/s 28J of Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal...

Non-compliance with the remand order of the Tribunal in the earlier round of litigation - import of rough marble blocks - The Tribunal noted the appellant's submission...

Exemption from GST - pure services or supply of goods to the Notified Area Authority, Vapi - Notified Area Authority, Vapi is a “local authority” or “governmental...

Order of cancellation of registration passed by Assessing Officer upheld by dismissing appeal on limitation ground challenged for not providing opportunity of hearing...

Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - generation of two e-way bills - It was held by Allahabad High Court that in the case in hand once the valid document i.e. e-way...

The subordinate authority is not empowered to supersede the orders passed by the appellate authority and an administrative discipline requires that the subordinate...

Since Commissioner (Appeals) has not followed the law declared by the Larger Bench, exemplary cost of ₹ 2500/- imposed for burdening the appellant for unnecessary...

As appeal against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) is pending before the Tribunal, the adjudicating authority dared to pass the impugned order. - This shows that the...

Quick Updates: