Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2020 Year 2020 This

Service of notice - time limitation - Escaped assessment of tax ...


Court Rules Tax Notice Invalid Due to Expired Six-Year Limitation Period; Action Should Have Begun in 2016-2017.

August 6, 2020

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Service of notice - time limitation - Escaped assessment of tax - escaped turnover - Even according to the respondent, the inspection took place in the year 2015; nothing stopped the respondent from taking action for assessing the escaped turnover immediately thereafter. Even if the respondent had taken action in the year 2016-2017 that would have been within the limitation period. Not having done so, the issuance of notice on 28.08.2018 after the expiry of six years limitation period, is not justifiable. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The HC held that the period of limitation for reopening assessments under Section 153C read with Section 153A must be calculated from the end of the assessment year...

  2. Re-assessment - Time limitation for notices issued - period of limitation enhanced from 5 years to 6 years - Prospective or retrospective amendment - 5 year period...

  3. The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the show-cause notice dated 20.08.2024 issued by the respondent authority in relation to the refund of integrated taxes...

  4. Recovery under demand notices based on alert issued 5 years ago - Bonds for Warehoused goods has already expired - The High Court determined that the demand notice...

  5. Notice issued for reopening assessment u/s 147 was beyond the limitation period stipulated in Section 149(1). The High Court, following Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Limited,...

  6. Initiation of CIRP - time limitation - In respect of the invoices raised in the year 2013 the prescribed period of limitation being three years in terms of Article 137...

  7. HC held reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid due to statutory limitation u/s 149. The original notice was set aside for lacking mandatory approvals...

  8. The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

  9. The HC quashed reassessment proceedings for AY 2016-17 initiated via notice u/s 148 issued on July 29, 2022. The Court found that since the reassessment action commenced...

  10. The High Court held that the show cause notices issued by the respondent u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, were flawed due to the improper...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - period of limitation extended to 16 years vide Finance Act, 2012- validity of notice for the period which has been expired already...

  12. HC held that show cause notices under Section 74(1) of CGST Act for alleged tax evasion must be issued separately for each financial year rather than through...

  13. The Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 concerning the period of limitation. The issue was whether the period of limitation for...

  14. The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

  15. The High Court held that the limitation period prescribed in Section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act for issuing a fresh assessment order pursuant to an order u/s 254 (by...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates