Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Perusal of the reasons ...

High Court Quashes Reassessment Order u/s 147 Due to Full Disclosure by Petitioner, No Nondisclosure Alleged by Officer.

August 14, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Perusal of the reasons extracted elsewhere in this order only referred to the issue of classification of royalty on merits and nowhere it is stated that there has been any failure by the petitioner in making a disclosure in this regard. To be fair to the Assessing Officer, he does not even make such allegation in the reasons for re-assessment and rightly so, since the material available would show a full disclosure by the petitioner at all stages of assessment - Reassessment order quashed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Perusal of the reasons ...

High Court Quashes Reassessment Order u/s 147 Due to Full Disclosure by Petitioner, No Nondisclosure Alleged by Officer.

August 14, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Cancellation of petitioner's registration due to alleged fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts in obtaining registration. Proper Officer issued show cause...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Validity of order of CIRP obtained - allegation of fraud on the part of Financial Creditor (FC) - The entire transaction as narrated in the Section 7 application is...

The HC upheld the rejection of petitioner's application for compounding an offense under Section 137 of the Customs Act, 1962. The court determined that compounding...

Refund amount recovered coercively - Despite paying 20% of the tax in dispute, the tax authorities issued a demand and forcibly recovered the full balance - GST...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The duty is cast upon the assessee to make true and full disclosure of the facts at the time of original assessment. The duty of the...

The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

Smuggling - burden to prove - invocation of Section 123 - the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 made before the customs officers is not a...

Territorial Jurisdiction - proper officer or not - Registration was assigned to Central GST Officer - SCN was issued by the State GST officer - the distribution of work...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Jurisdiction of Central Tax Officers - CGST officers - Notification

TDS returns - Due dates - Rule 31A prescribing due dates for furnishing TDS statements amended

DRI officers were appointed as officers of customs through notifications issued by the Department of Revenue, empowering them to issue show cause notices u/s 28 of the...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the Resolution Plan must provide for payment of Provident Fund and Gratuity dues in accordance with Section...

Quick Updates: