Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional ...

Pr. CIT invokes Section 263 to challenge AO's reassessment u/s 68, citing inadequate enquiry and incomplete fact collection.

August 19, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment order - if the Second Pr. CIT had to find the order of Second AO erroneous for lack of enquiry or for not collecting the entire facts, then the Second Pr. CIT ought to have called for the additional facts which he thinks that the Second AO has not collected from the assessee or the shareholders and then explained in his impugned order as to what effect those additional documents would have made on the second assessment order/reassessment order or in other words the impact on the decision making process of framing the second assessment order due to the failure of second AO’s omission to collect the additional documents. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional ...

Pr. CIT invokes Section 263 to challenge AO's reassessment u/s 68, citing inadequate enquiry and incomplete fact collection.

August 19, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

Distinction between "lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry" emphasized. Assessee underwent rigorous assessment proceedings with multiple notices and replies. AO...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - no enquiry v/s incomplete enquiry - The valuation was carried at the insistence of the ld. AO to verify the physical existence of the property...

The ITAT held that neither the initiation of reassessment proceedings nor the addition made by the AO u/s 68 can be sustained. The AO drew an inference from an...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - lack of inquiry v/s inadequate inquiry - apparently from the records and as per the observations of the Ld. PR. CIT, coupled with the failure...

Revision u/s 263 - As seen from the assessment order that the AO had made enquiries in respect of the cost of construction and it cannot be said that no query was raised...

Assessee obtained loans from two corporate entities to purchase properties. AO treated these loans as unexplained cash credits u/s 68, relying solely on third-party...

CIT invoked revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 alleging AO did not examine provision for subcontracting expenses and refund claim during reassessment proceedings. Assessee...

Revision u/s 263 - “no inquiry” v/s “inadequate inquiry” - there is a distinction between merely calling for information on a particular issue and considering such...

Addition u/s 68 - it is contended before AO that advances (cash credit) were made against the purchase of goods - AO and the Appellate Authority have the power of Civil...

The HC upheld reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO against the petitioner based on funds received by NNPLC (petitioner's wholly-owned subsidiary). The AO relied...

The ITAT Kolkata examined the validity of reassessment proceedings based on "reasons to believe" u/s 147. The AO's reasons lacked independent application of mind, being...

Revision u/s 263 - ‘On-money’ receipt - the view taken by the A.O. was one of the possible views and the assessment order passed by him could not be held to be erroneous...

Quick Updates: