Recovery of amount u/s 11D - even if it is assumed that the ...

Court Rules Duty on Ethanol Must Be Separately Shown and Recovered u/s 11D of Central Excise Act.

September 18, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Recovery of amount u/s 11D - even if it is assumed that the process of blending of ethanol with motor spirit does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944, even than the duty paid on motor spirit (EBP) cannot be construed as duty paid separately on Motor spirit and proportionate duty applicable to ethanol in the total duty be recoverable u/s 11D of Central Excise Act, 1944, when the price charged was inclusive of duty, and the duty attributable to Ethanol is not shown and recovered separately in the invoice - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Recovery of amount u/s 11D - even if it is assumed that the ...

Court Rules Duty on Ethanol Must Be Separately Shown and Recovered u/s 11D of Central Excise Act.

September 18, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

The appellant paid excise duty on the removal of inputs as such, based on the transaction value. However, this excise duty was found to be in excess of the actual CENVAT...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Applicability of Section 11D to the facts of the present case - the Revenue could not show that the appellant after blending ethanol with duty paid motor spirit...

The appellant had reversed CENVAT credit on input services amounting to 10.3% in terms of Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that Section 11D...

Assessable value – As per Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000, the transportation charges shown separately in the invoice or charge separately are not...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Demand of duty u/s 11D of the Central Excise Act 1944 - SSI units - price is inclusive of duty of excise - Since the appellant has not collected the Excise duty from the...

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the object of both the provisions is clear and the only difference is that Chapter X uses the word “remission” of duty on excisable goods”...

Though the assessee paid the excise duty at ₹ 80/- (after debiting ₹ 20/- paid on input, namely, Cut Tobaco) they recovered excise duty at ₹ 100/- from...

Quick Updates: