Revision u/s 263 - Whether Tribunal is right in holding that, ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 12, 2020

Revision u/s 263 - Whether Tribunal is right in holding that, CBDT Instruction No.3 dated 20.05.2003 is not binding on the AO and as such the AO himself determining the Transfer Pricing adjustment is justified and hence the order of assessment cannot be said to be erroneous - The impugned order passed by the ITAT is clearly unsustainable - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Whether Tribunal is right in holding that, ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 12, 2020

You may also like:

Binding effect of instruction of CBDT on AO - In view of the guidelines issued by the CBDT in Instruction No.3/2003 the Tribunal was right in observing that by not...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the issues on which the reassessment order was passed u/s 147 read with Section 143(3) and the issues on which the revision order was...

Revision u/s 263 - non reference to TPO - cases as selected for scrutiny on non transfer pricing risk parameters - The necessary enquiries and examination as reasonably...

By deciding the question of limitation of AY 2000-01 against Revenue, and by holding that there was no tax liability for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05, these two sets of...

Maintainability of the appeal - Instruction of CBDT for not filing or withdrawing appeal on low tax effect - Once the Tribunal has pronounced upon the merits of the...

Applicability of Notification No. 43/2015-20 dated 05.11.2018 to SEZ units-reg.

The validity of the scrutiny process was challenged due to the lack of approval obtained by the Assessing Officer from the Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of...

Revision u/s 263 - Revision barred by limitation or not? - Period to be computed from the date of original assessment u/s 143(3) or from the date of subsequent order...

Revision u/s 263 - impugned notice which seeks to give effect to an order u/s 263 for revision u/s 143(3) falls u/s 153(3) and not u/s 153 (2A) - there is no limitation...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the revision u/s 263 of the Act regarding the allowability of deduction of interest claimed u/s 57. The Tribunal held...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Non reference of matter to the TPO - no prudent business person properly instructed in law would have inferred the TP risk parameter as a...

Disallowance of SWAP loss under section 37(1) - As for the CBDT instructions, it is only elementary that any instructions issued by the CBDT cannot bind the assessee...

Revision u/s 263 - Period of limitation - To be commenced from original assessment order or re-assessment order u/s 147 - In the case on hand, the jurisdiction under...

Notification 52/2003-Cus dated 31.03.2003 governs the re-import of goods after export. Sr. No. 14 allows re-import for repair/reconditioning within 3/7 years,...

Scope and validity of policy circular - EPCG Authorisation - The impugned policy circular dated 29.03.2019 is therefore, beyond the jurisdiction of respondent no. 3 as...

Quick Updates: