Profiteering - Till the State Consumer Welfare Funds become ...

Petitioner Must Deposit Full Amount with Centre Consumer Welfare Funds Until State Funds Are Operational.

October 27, 2020

Case Laws GST HC

Profiteering - Till the State Consumer Welfare Funds become operational and necessary details of the State CWFs are made available to the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to deposit the entire amount with the Centre Consumer Welfare Funds. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - Till the State Consumer Welfare Funds become ...

Petitioner Must Deposit Full Amount with Centre Consumer Welfare Funds Until State Funds Are Operational.

October 27, 2020

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

HC held that petitioner was entitled to refund of IGST and Service Tax paid on ocean freight following Mohit Minerals precedent. While addressing unjust enrichment...

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in the GST rate not passed - The profiteered amount is determined as ₹ 78,41,754/- as has been computed in...

Profiteering - restaurant service - the Respondent had increased the base prices of different items by more than 11.16% i.e. by more than what was required to offset the...

Profiteering - restaurant services - allegation that benefit of reduction in GST rate not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in prices - contravention of section...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Security deposit - amount not to be credited to consumer welfare fund - appellants are eligible for refund of cash security...

Profiteering - Sanitary Napkin - allegation is that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of exemption of GST on Sanitary Napkin by way of commensurate reduction in...

Consumer Welfare Fund. - Deposit of amount into the fund - Payment of amount from the fund - Audit of the fund - Standing Committee of the fund - Rule 97 of the GST...

Unjust-enrichment - Refund allowed but directed to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund of India - o the amount deposited during investigation, basing - The...

Principles of unjust enrichment - Refund amount ordered to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund instead of being paid to the appellant - The Tribunal interprets...

Consumer Welfare Fund. - an amount equivalent to fifty per cent. of the amount of cess determined under sub-section (5) of section 54 read with section 11 of the Goods...

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Tribunal on merit of claim held that no service tax is payable - the adjudicating authority did sanction the refund but...

One Time Settlement Scheme for Recovery of Outstanding Dues, 2023. The Court held that the amount deposited by the petitioner, which was categorized as disputed tax,...

HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

Petitioner deposited amount under alleged coercion and protest, claiming inadmissible Input Tax Credit availed. Respondent disputed coercion, stating voluntary deposit....

SVLDRS - Right of the petitioner to get deduction of deposits made prior to the issuance of show cause notice - Amount deposited by the petitioner falls in the second...

Quick Updates: