Baggage Rules - high value electronic items - the addresses of ...

Baggage Rules on High-Value Electronics: Lack of Evidence for Valuation in SCN and OIO; Penalties Reduced u/s 112(b).

October 30, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

Baggage Rules - high value electronic items - the addresses of web sites from where the values are taken are not mentioned. Copies or screenshots of websites displaying the value of the products is not also made available. Similarly, there was no reasoning, for adoption of such values and the Rules under which the same is arrived at, has been given either in the SCN or OIO. - while holding that the good are liable for confiscation and the appellants are liable for penalty under Section 112(b), the request for reducing the penalties can be accepted. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Baggage Rules - high value electronic items - the addresses of ...

Baggage Rules on High-Value Electronics: Lack of Evidence for Valuation in SCN and OIO; Penalties Reduced u/s 112(b).

October 30, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a)/112(b)/114A/114AA of Customs Act - Smuggling - Gold Bars - Baggage Rules - Here in the case on hand, some of the officials are not even put on...

CESTAT set aside penalties imposed under s.112(a) and s.112(b) of Customs Act 1962 against appellant for alleged gold smuggling. Court found insufficient evidence beyond...

Levy of penalty - smuggling of Gold - baggage rules - The case involved the petitioner's challenge against the imposition of a penalty under Sections 112(a) and 112(b)...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under...

The case involved penalties u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act for smuggling foreign gold. The tribunal held that statements without cross-examination are...

Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

Appellant's penalties u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 set aside. Reliance solely on co-accused statements without corroborative evidence found...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Quick Updates: