Validity of Search and seizure action - The Court can examine ...

Court Upholds Search and Seizure Action u/s 132(1) of Income Tax Act; No Interference Warranted.

December 14, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of Search and seizure action - The Court can examine whether the reasons to believe have a rational connection or are relevant bearing to the formation of such belief, and are not extraneous or irrelevant to the purpose of the Section. But, as at the Court cannot sit in appeal or test the adequacy of the opinion formed by the Assessing Officer under Section 132 - having regard to the settled legal position on the subject, we are of the view that the action initiated by the Respondents under Section 132(1) of the Act qua the Petitioners does not call for any interference by this Court. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Search and seizure action - The Court can examine ...

Court Upholds Search and Seizure Action u/s 132(1) of Income Tax Act; No Interference Warranted.

December 14, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of search and seizure u/s 132 - The Bombay High Court quashed the search and seizure actions conducted by the Income Tax Department u/s 132 of the Income Tax...

Legality of search and seizure conducted at the residential premises of the petitioner - The High Court meticulously analyzed the legislative intent and statutory...

Search and seizure u/s 132 - sufficiency and insufficiency of reasons to belief for warrant of authorization - Even if it is presumed for a moment that warrant relating...

Valid search - proceedings initiated under Section 132 - Note of satisfaction does record reasons calling for necessary authorization to carry out search and seizure...

Initiation of search and seizure u/s 132 - stock-in-trade of business cannot be seized during search and seizure operations conducted on or after June 1, 2003 - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

Validity of Search and seizure - conversion of survey in search - provisions of Section 131(1) could be invoked only if some proceedings were pending - nowhere any...

The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAB of the Income Tax Act for additional income brought to tax owing to a search and seizure action. The...

alidity of search u/s 132 - law was amended by insertion of aforesaid Explanation by the Parliament in section 132 by the Finance Act, 2017 w.r.e.f. 1.4.1962 and it was...

Validity of the assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) - post search assessment - in the case on hand the pending reassessment proceedings u/s 147 got abated by...

Penalty u/s 271AAB - search and seizure u/s 132(1) - if cash seized during the course of search and seizure, offered the same for taxation and accept the same in filing...

Assessment u/s 143(3) - search and seizure action U/s 132 was taken during pendency of assessment proceedings - proceedings initiated U/s 143(3) stood abated by virtue...

The court examined the validity of search and seizure u/s 132, focusing on the scope of Revenue's power and the "reasons to believe" requirement. It held that the...

Seizure of cash in election by ECI - IT Dept. has completely failed to appreciate that neither the seizure was u/s 132 nor the pre-requisite to an exercise of search and...

Penalty imposed u/s. 271AAB(1)(a) - search and seizure action u/s. 132(1) - commission amount was not recorded in the books of account - since the assessee as per law...

Quick Updates: