Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2020 Year 2020 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee has not brought on ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

December 15, 2020

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee has not brought on record any evidence to prove the genuineness of the share premium and has also miserably failed to establish on record that there is neither any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, in our view, is justified - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee did not comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act requiring the assessee to furnish certain information - Neither the AO nor...

  2. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  3. Addition u/s 68 - share application money/share capital and share premium as unexplained - The onus was on revenue to dislodge assessee’s documentary evidences and rebut...

  4. Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

  6. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  7. Unexplained share capital and share premium - Not only the assessee has proved the identity and creditworthiness of the investors and genuineness of the transactions by...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

  9. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  10. Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

  11. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

  12. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  13. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  14. Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

  15. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates