Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - the phraseology, ...

High Court Rules Defective Notice Invalid u/s 271(1)(c); Assessee's Explanation Sufficient to Avoid Penalty.

December 16, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - the phraseology, which was adopted by the assessee, if read as a whole, would clearly show that he had objected to the issuance of the notice and as there was no basis for issuance of the notice under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, both limbs in the said provision do not get attracted. - the burden cast upon the assessee to offer an explanation stands fulfilled. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - the phraseology, ...

High Court Rules Defective Notice Invalid u/s 271(1)(c); Assessee's Explanation Sufficient to Avoid Penalty.

December 16, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Defective notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) for levying penalty. The key points are: The phrases "conceal" and "furnishing of inaccurate particulars" in...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has surrendered and agreed for the additions at the assessment stage merely to buy peace of mind and to avoid further litigation...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - new plea before the authorities below - In this case in hand, there is no such plea...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure on the part of legal heir of the deceased assessee to explain the source of part of the deposits - The mere failure on the part of the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - non specification of charge - Notice as barred by limitation u/s 275 - mere non-acceptance of the explanation so...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(C) for a defective notice related to TP adjustments. The AO determined arm's length OP/OC at...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

Quick Updates: