Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2020 Year 2020 This

Seizure and detention of goods - Confiscation of goods - Section ...


Goods Seizure u/s 130 Deemed Illegal; No Intent to Evade Tax Found, Confiscation Conditions Not Met.

December 21, 2020

Case Laws     GST     HC

Seizure and detention of goods - Confiscation of goods - Section 130 of the Act - It has not been established that there was any contravention of any provision or any Rules with an "intent to evade payment of tax" - none of the ingredients which are required for confiscation existed in the present case and thus, the confiscation itself was wholly arbitrary and illegal. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty - goods were seized goods for not accompanied by E-way bills - Upon a purposive reading of the sections 129, 130 and 138, it would suffice to state that...

  2. Confiscation of goods alongwith the vehicle - absence of valid documents - Under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, confiscation may be absolute if the goods in...

  3. HC upheld confiscation notice issued under Section 130 of TNGST Act regarding transport of gold jewelry. Officials established prima facie evidence of tax evasion...

  4. The Kerala HC held that provisional release of goods is permissible u/s 67(6) of the GST Act even after initiation of proceedings u/s 130. The adjudication can proceed...

  5. Confiscation of Goods and vehicle - Sections 129 and 130 of GST - Even in the absence of the physical availability of the goods or the conveyance, the authority can...

  6. Non-generation of e-way bill during transportation of goods led to seizure order u/s 129(3) of GST Act, imposing penalty and interest. However, it was admitted that...

  7. The seized gold lacked foreign inscriptions, embossments, or 99.9% purity, and the seizure memo did not mention the officer's reasonable belief that the gold was liable...

  8. The case involved a challenge to a penalty imposed u/s 129 of the Goods and Service Tax Acts. The court held that without proof of intent to evade tax, such penalties...

  9. The interplay between Sections 129 and 130 of the CGST Act was analyzed. Section 129 applies when goods are in transit, while Section 130 allows confiscation and penalty...

  10. Seizure of goods - Jurisdiction - Ethanol - goods in question were not prohibited goods - The High court found that the seizure of the petitioner's goods was prima facie...

  11. Legality and validity of such seizure of goods - It is evident from the seizure memo as well as the materials as on that date i.e., 09.01.2020 that there could not have...

  12. E-Way Bill was not properly filled, but upon inspection, no discrepancy was found between the physically available goods and the goods disclosed in the E-Way Bill. The...

  13. Detention of goods and vehicle - detention was for the reason that the vehicle was apprehended at a place that was not on the normal route between Kanyakumari and...

  14. HC upheld seizure of goods under GST Act due to petitioner's failure to establish actual physical movement of goods from West Bengal/Assam to Delhi via Kanpur. Following...

  15. Seeking release of goods - The two different stages in which the goods can be released - during adjudication and post-adjudication are obviously created with a purpose....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates