Parallel enquiry proceedings by the officers of different ...

Officers Can Conduct Parallel Inquiries Under U.P.G.S.T. and C.G.S.T. Acts; Section 6(2)(b) Prohibition Not Applicable Here.

January 5, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

Parallel enquiry proceedings by the officers of different jurisdiction - Proper officer under the U.P.G.S.T. Act or the C.G.S.T. Act may invoke power under Section 70 in any inquiry. Prohibition of Section 6(2)(b) of the C.G.S.T. Act shall come into play only when any proceeding on the same subject-matter has already been initiated by a proper officer under the U.P.G.S.T. Act - In the present case, since the subject-matter is different, the prohibition does not come into play - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Parallel enquiry proceedings by the officers of different ...

Officers Can Conduct Parallel Inquiries Under U.P.G.S.T. and C.G.S.T. Acts; Section 6(2)(b) Prohibition Not Applicable Here.

January 5, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Validity of reopening of assessment - Enquiry to be conducted before issuance of a notice by the AO u/s 148A(a) - The High court found that conducting an inquiry before...

The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

The assessment order was passed without verifying the allowability of the cost of improvement as per Section 55(1)(b)(2), rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - as per CIT AO had failed to verify applicability of the provisions of Section 56(2)(viia) - As far as the invocation of Explanation 2 to...

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

Inquiry proceedings under Service Tax - apprehension of arrest - The summons issued to the petitioners / petitioner No.2, does not authorize the investigating officer to...

Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii) - relevant Section 50C cannot be invoked as the said section is applicable in the case of seller of the property only while the appellant is a...

Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

Validity of Parallel proceedings under GST - the device of transferring investigations or proceedings inter se proper officers to ensure that a taxpayer is not subjected...

Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

Respondent no. 2, an improper officer, substantially conducted investigation, inspection, search, seizure, and recorded statements against the petitioner. Respondent no....

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Revision u/s 263 - the facts demonstrate that necessary enquiry have been conducted by the AO and relevant documents regarding the issue was received by the AO - CIT may...

Validity of revision u/s 263 regarding eligibility for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) on interest income from deposits with a cooperative bank was examined. It was held that...

Quick Updates: