Levy of penalty u/s 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - It ...

Court Rules Dyeing Units Not Entitled to Section 8(3)(b) Benefits Under Central Sales Tax Act; No Tax Evasion Allowed.

February 22, 2021

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Levy of penalty u/s 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - It was therefore stated that the dyeing units were not engaged in any manufacturing activity - job work/works contract or not - They are merely service provider. If a liberalized interpretation is given in the light of the above decisions, they will be entitled to the benefit of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 as was claimed by the petitioner - However, the scheme of the concession is specific under Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Therefore, the Courts cannot aid evasion of tax by reading down the express language of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - It ...

Court Rules Dyeing Units Not Entitled to Section 8(3)(b) Benefits Under Central Sales Tax Act; No Tax Evasion Allowed.

February 22, 2021

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

The Department of Commerce (DoC) has issued clarifications regarding the newly inserted SEZ Rule 11B, notified on 6.12.2023, which allows the setup of non-SEZ IT/ITES...

Assessment of turnover of the applicant as per Section 4(3) of the VAT - levy of tax on turnover of sale has to be done in the manner provided in Section 4(3) of the Act...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Input Tax Credit - denial of credit capital goods of the unit -2 on the ground that credit cannot be availed before the commencement of commercial production as per...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Application of Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - There is no percentage fixed in the Cenvat Credit Rules to decide that if dutiable goods are much below that...

The High Court addressed the issue of linking services provided by a company to its separate registered units for taxation purposes under CENVAT Credit Rules. The court...

Valuation of imported goods - Admittedly, it is evident on the face of the record that deductive value was available before the Court below which have not been rejected...

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

CENVAT Credit - Whether the department can demand and recover under Rule 14 an amount under Rule 6(3) (i) equal to 10% of the value of the exempted products? - under no...

Refund of input service Credit - transitional provision under Section 142(3) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 11-B of Central Excise Act,...

Transfer of capital goods to sister unit (transfer of business) - Rule 3 (5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - The conditionalities of Rule 10 given in sub-rule (3)...

The notification amends the Companies (Registration of Foreign Companies) Rules, 2014. It substitutes the word "Registrar" with "Registrar, Central Registration Centre"...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Quick Updates: