Exemption u/s 11 denied - intimation was issued u/s. 143(1) - ...

Tribunal Rules CPC's Rejection of Exemption Claim u/s 143(1) Unjustified; Expenditure Must Be Considered.

March 22, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Exemption u/s 11 denied - intimation was issued u/s. 143(1) - The Central Processing Center has also taxed the entire gross receipt of the assessee without allowing any expenditure. This cannot be done while processing the return u/s. 143(1) of the Act. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that Section 143(1) is meant for prima facie adjustment on the basis of material available on record without giving any opportunity to the assessee. Therefore, rejection of the claim of exemption u/s. 143(1) by Central Processing Center is not justified. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Exemption u/s 11 denied - intimation was issued u/s. 143(1) - ...

Tribunal Rules CPC's Rejection of Exemption Claim u/s 143(1) Unjustified; Expenditure Must Be Considered.

March 22, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Disallowance of expenditure while processing the return u/s 143(1) by the CPC - the CPC has erred in disallowing the assessee’s claim of expenditure while processing the...

Validity of assessment passed w/o intimating u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 11 and Claim of Expenses by the CPC - The Appellate Tribunal noted that the return of...

Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before...

Validity of Intimation passed u/s 143(1) - Rectification of arithmetical error or prima facie incorrect claim - CPC is entitled to make adjustments as per 1st proviso of...

Disallowance made by the CPC in an intimation issued u/s. 143(1) denying the exemption claimed u/s. 11 - where a claim has been made which requires further inquiry, it...

The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

The ITAT Ahmedabad considered a case involving exemption u/s 11 for a trust with a belatedly filed income return. The tribunal held that the trust, registered u/s 12AA,...

Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

Validity of Adjustment done by the CPC u/s 143 (1)(a)(v) - Deduction u/s 80P disallowed - Prior to amendment in deduction u/s 143(1)(a)(v) by Finance Act on 01.04.2021,...

Addition by way of adjustment u/s 143(1) by CPC - Procedure - Unlike the old scheme of ‘prima facie adjustments’ u/s 143(1)(a), the scheme of present section 143(1) does...

Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section...

Failure to file Form 10/10B before due date prescribed u/s 139(1) cannot be fatal to deny exemption u/s 11(2), especially when Form 10/10B was available on record when...

Validity of adjustments made in an intimation u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, where there was a mismatch between the income tax return and the tax audit report filed...

Adjustment made by the CPC (Centralized Processing Centre) u/sec. 143(1) - CPC did not allow set off of brought forward losses against the short term capital gain and...

Intimation u/s 143(1) as appealable order u/s 246A - CIT(A) had wrongly mentioned in the order reproduced herein above that no appeal lies against the intimation issued...

Quick Updates: