Jurisdiction - The complaint filed by respondent No.2 cannot be ...

Case Laws GST

March 22, 2021

Jurisdiction - The complaint filed by respondent No.2 cannot be said to be beyond his jurisdiction because the previous sanction of the Commissioner as provided for under Section 132(6) of CGST Act, would be required only after the conclusion of the investigation and at the stage of presentation of charge-sheet/final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., when judicial notice of the offence(s) are taken for the first time by a Court of law. Lodging of the FIR does not amount to prosecution and is clearly distinguishable from prosecution. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction - The complaint filed by respondent No.2 cannot be ...

Case Laws GST

March 22, 2021

You may also like:

Grant of Default/statutory Bail - availment of illegal CENVAT Credit - This Court is of the opinion that though the complaint filed by respondent No.2 cannot be said to...

Jurisdiction of income tax authorities - Transfer of case u/s 127 - No document has been produced on the file by the Department to show that the case was transferred by...

Cancellation of summons - Jurisdiction - Import of jewellery in violation of Baggage Rules - High Profile case - Connivance of the Police officers - The customs...

Criminal complaint filed u/s 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable u/s 276C(2) read with Section 278B of the Income Tax Act. Petitioners failed to deposit assessed...

Validity of notice u/s 143(2) - Jurisdiction of ACIT to issue notice - No document has been produced on the file by the Department to show that the case was transferred...

Limitation Period for issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Scrutiny Assessment - Relevant date - after filing of the return of income, defect notice u/s 139(9) had been sent...

Jurisdiction - condonation of delay beyond the period of 45 days - We have no doubt in our mind that the Appellant has missed the bus by causing delay in filing the...

Dishonor of Cheque - Though, the Court has the power to quash the criminal complaint filed u/s 138 of the N.I. Act on the legal issues like limitation, etc. Criminal...

Dishonour of cheque - no order for conversion into summons triable matter - application of Section 145(2) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - violation of natural...

Criminal Complaint filed u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act - According to us, the F.I.R. in question filed against the appellants – herein by Respondent No.2 is...

Territorial jurisdiction of Hon'ble Court at Rohtak - Investigation conducted by the DGGI, Rohtak - All alleged Firms/ Companies are 'Registered' under the CGST Act,...

Dishonour of Cheque - whether filing of a premature complaint debars, filing of a fresh complaint when the time becomes ripe to file the complaint? - The High Court,...

Scrutiny assessment - validity of notice issued u/s.143(2) - jurisdiction of AO - Transfer of case - the ACIT(OSD), Range-2, Bhubaneswar could not have jurisdiction to...

The complaint was time-barred and filed beyond the stipulated period u/s 142(b) of the NI Act. The demand notice was served to the accused company through email on 11.03....

Dishonor of Cheque - jurisdiction of the court for proceedings initiated on a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - As admitted by the...

Quick Updates: