Refund of Unutilised Credit in cash - section 142(6) of CGST ...

Appeal for Refund Under CGST Act Dismissed by CESTAT Due to Lack of Jurisdiction; Presented Case Under Wrong Act.

March 23, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund of Unutilised Credit in cash - section 142(6) of CGST Act, 2017 - the appellant has an arguable case for refund under Central Excise Act, but since the claim is clearly under CGST Act, 2017 the jurisdiction over which is not vested with CESTAT, the present appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of Unutilised Credit in cash - section 142(6) of CGST ...

Appeal for Refund Under CGST Act Dismissed by CESTAT Due to Lack of Jurisdiction; Presented Case Under Wrong Act.

March 23, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Non-payment of GST - recovery of tax alongwith interest and penalty - Jurisdiction - Even if we accept the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that...

Entitlement of Interest on delayed refund - relevant date for calculation of time - In the present case, refund arises only after passing of order-in-appeal by the...

Territorial Jurisdiction of Delhi High Court - LLP is registered in Hyderabad - It is evident from the facts of the present case that there is no principal or...

Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer u/s 120 - Transfer of case u/s 124 - Assessee had a legitimate expectation from the DCIT, Circle-3, Gurgaon, that the objection raised...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Reassessment order u/s 147 - the AO does not enjoy the power of review. Therefore in the present case it is clear that the action of the present AO tantamount to review...

Refund of Service Tax - time limitation - Exercise of power u/s 142(3) of GST Act for refund of service tax - The case involves the rejection of a refund claim by the...

Jurisdiction issue regarding the refund claim filed by the service receiver, whether the Mumbai Service Tax authority or the Kolkata Service Tax authority has the...

The case involves a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) to entertain an appeal u/s 142(9) of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding refund of CENVAT...

Territorial Jurisdiction - proper officer or not - Registration was assigned to Central GST Officer - SCN was issued by the State GST officer - the distribution of work...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

The Larger Bench held that an appeal against an order passed u/s 142(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 is maintainable before the CESTAT. The Tribunal, citing a precedent...

Refund claim - rejection of refund on the ground that no appeal was filed - In the present case, the Revenue admittedly, amended the Bills of Entry by re-assessing the...

Procedure relating to sanction, post-audit and review of refund claims - Guidelines issued to ensure uniformity in issuance of speaking order for refund - Details...

Quick Updates: