Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2021 Year 2021 This

Refund - rebuttal of presumption - the word “buyer” in clause ...

Case Laws     Central Excise

April 1, 2021

Refund - rebuttal of presumption - the word “buyer” in clause (e) to proviso to Section 11B(2) of the Act cannot be restricted to the first buyer from the manufacturer. - the assessee paid additional duty of excise and had passed on the incidence of duty to its customers at the time of issue invoices/gate passes. Therefore, the subsequent issuance of credit note is of little avail as the incidence for the excise duty is deemed to have been passed on by the assessee to its buyer and therefore not entitled for filing an application for refund under Section 11B of the Act merely because they subsequently came to know that the rate of duty was NIL and credit notes are said to have been issued to the buyer. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Dishonor of Promissory Notes - Suit for recovery of money, based on two promissory notes - rebuttal of presumption - No doubt, by proving the execution of the promissory...

  2. Valuation - Related person - In terms of Sub-Clause (iii) of Section 4(3)(b) a person shall be deemed to be related if amongst them the buyer is a relative and...

  3. Refund due of revision in price escalation clause - refund claim was filed withing one year from the issuance of credit notes - refund allowed - AT

  4. Interest on refund - the wording of Section 42(1) of DVAT Act is unambiguous which talks of the two dates i.e. date the refund was due to be paid to the person and...

  5. Refund claim - time limitation - excess payment of service tax - rejection of refund claim as barred by limitation of time on the ground of delay in filing such...

  6. Dishonor of Cheque - rebuttal of presumptions - The 2nd respondent did not even respond to the lawyer notice. It is true that no adverse inference can be drawn against...

  7. The presumption u/s. 292C is a rebuttal presumption. The presumption as envisaged in section 292C is limited to the correctness of the documents found at the time of...

  8. Refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit - inverted duty structure - Under Clause (i) of the proviso to Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, refund of ITC is available in cases...

  9. Refund of Service Tax amount - Period of limitation - advance amount returned/ refunded to the buyer - Once the buyer cancelled the booking and the consideration for...

  10. Dishonor of cheque - denial of reasonable opportunity to explain the incriminating circumstances - rebuttal of statutory presumptions - In the instant case, apparently...

  11. Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - rebuttal of presumption - The case put forth by the respondent does not satisfy the requirement of rebuttal even if tested...

  12. Refund of central excise duty claimed by the buyer - duty was paid under protest - applicability of time limitation - The scheme of Section 11B makes a distinction...

  13. Refund of excess duty paid - price variation clause - where it was held that where there is price variation clause and the prices have been reduced subsequent to...

  14. Complaint u/s 138 - The presumption under Section 139 of the Act, is always in favour of the complainant. Though it is a rebuttable presumption, the rebuttal has to come...

  15. Presumption u/ss 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not properly applied by the Trial Court. When presumption u/s 139 is raised, the onus shifts to the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates