Levy of Interest - The respondent is not justified in levying ...

Court Rules Interest Levy Unjustified for Rainbow Restaurant; Section 42 Clarifies Tax Liability Start Date.

April 14, 2021

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Levy of Interest - The respondent is not justified in levying interest from the original assessment year - In the case on hand, Rathna Residency is not the petitioner before this Court. It is only Rainbow Restaurant that is the petitioner before this Court. Rainbow Restaurant is contending that it cannot be considered as “a restaurant attached to a star hotel”. Thus the petitioner was under a bonefide impression that they are not liable to pay tax at a higher rate. Therefore, as per Section 42 of the Act, only from the date on which the petitioner's liability is quantified, the question of paying tax would arise. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Interest - The respondent is not justified in levying ...

Court Rules Interest Levy Unjustified for Rainbow Restaurant; Section 42 Clarifies Tax Liability Start Date.

April 14, 2021

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

The court interpreted provisions of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (Local Body Tax) Rules, clarifying the...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The Income Tax Settlement Commission passed an order charging interest u/ss 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act. The petitioners challenged the order's...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

The appellants challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) denying eligible interest on the refunded amount. The court held that interest accrued on the deposited...

The High Court addressed the demand for interest u/s 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It clarified that interest on delayed tax payment is not...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Supplementary refund of unutilized input tax credit pertaining to Compensatory Cess - Section 164 of the GST Act empowers the Government to frame rules. Refund of...

The case dealt with the interpretation of interest clauses in an arbitration award, specifically whether interest could be payable on interest or if the awarded 15% per...

The case pertains to the levy of interest u/s 234C for failure on the part of the payer to deduct tax deducted at source (TDS) u/ss 196D and 194LD. The key points are:...

Levy of interest and penalty - transition of amount wrongly claimed as input tax credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - The court confirmed that the petitioner was...

Levy of penalty - taking CENVAT Credit irregularly - it is the contention of the Assessee that there is some element of discretion available in the adjudicating officer...

Interest paid on late payment of TDS - allowable deduction u/s 37(1) or not? - Interest on delayed payment of TDS cannot be allowed as deduction. - The interest...

Interest on Delayed Refund of Input Tax Credit - Proviso to Section 56 specified increased interest rates for refunds arising from orders of adjudicating or appellate...

Prospective or Retrospective application of amendment to the provisions of the Act and Rules - The High Court touched upon the principle that delegated legislation,...

Quick Updates: