Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2021 Year 2021 This

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s. 68 - This is not a case of ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

May 3, 2021

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s. 68 - This is not a case of non-enquiry or non-application of mind. The Assessing Officer has examined all the evidences and taken a possible view. Just because the total income determined by the Assessing Officer in the second round of assessment proceedings, is less than the income determined in the first assessment proceedings, the order does not become erroneous. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 - “no inquiry” v/s “inadequate inquiry” - there is a distinction between merely calling for information on a particular issue and considering such...

  2. Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - in the light of the judicial precedents and in the light of fact that AO has conducted enquiries in respect of share capital...

  3. The assessee claimed exemption from long-term capital gains tax on the sale of agricultural land situated beyond the prescribed distance from municipal limits. The...

  4. Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

  6. Addition u/s 68 - non independent application of mind - accommodation entries - share application money - Mere non production of Director of said share holder company...

  7. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - the transaction has never been examined by the assessing officer. No enquiry has been conducted relating to the alleged sum....

  8. The assessee's appeal against the Commissioner's revision order u/s 263 was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO), after reopening the assessment...

  9. Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

  10. Revision u/s 263 - This is also not a case where the Commissioner failed to undertake inquiry in the course of the exercise of revisional jurisdiction. It is only in...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal regarding the revision u/s 263 concerning unsecured loans received. The Principal Commissioner found that the...

  12. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - AO did not make befitting inquiry in the given circumstances and the CIT has held the assessment order to be erroneous and...

  14. The Appellate Tribunal held that the issues on which the reassessment order was passed u/s 147 read with Section 143(3) and the issues on which the revision order was...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates