Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2021 Year 2021 This

Refund of excess amount of Duty and interest paid - principles ...


Court Rules Accounting Practices Don't Affect Tax Refund Claims Under Unjust Enrichment Principles; One Year Records Insufficient.

July 10, 2021

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Refund of excess amount of Duty and interest paid - principles of unjust enrichment - The refund here, in this case, is claimed for a few years only and just by referring to one year’s Books of Account, it cannot be concluded that the expenditure having not been carried forward, the same is not considered as a receivable. In any case, nothing turns in so far as taxation is concerned on a mere accounting treatment. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

  2. The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

  3. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the deduction of the amount claimed as refund by them as expense in his profit and loss account, i.e. as a...

  4. Remission of Central Excise Duty - The tribunal found Rule 21 inapplicable, as it pertains to goods lost or destroyed before clearance from the factory, not to loss of...

  5. Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

  6. Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order of original authority rejecting the refund claim on the ground of unjust...

  7. Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

  8. Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

  9. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

  10. The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the denial of refund of excess tax paid by contractors under the Haryana Alternative Tax Compliance Scheme for Contractors,...

  11. Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

  12. The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

  13. Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

  14. Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

  15. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates