Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2021 Year 2021 This

Validity of decision of IRP/RP holding that the claimant/ ...

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy

September 27, 2021

Validity of decision of IRP/RP holding that the claimant/ Applicant is a Financial Creditor but is not eligible to be a part of CoC - related party in terms of Section 5(24)(m) & 5(24) (i) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 - Respondent No. 1 ASK Investment Managers Ltd is a related party to the Corporate Debtor; therefore, it cannot be made part of COC with voting rights - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Power of RP to admit the Claims suo-motu - There is no such provision that the IRP shall admit the Claim without filing a Claim either in Form-B or in Form-C. - the IRP...

  2. CIRP - Related party - Appellant being ‘related party’ cannot be part of the CoC - present is not a case where IRP has reviewed its decision - there is no error in the...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order and dismissed the appeal filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) against the Operational Creditor. The...

  4. CIRP proceedings - Infirmities and illegalities committed by the RP - it is evident that the RP had not taken any reasonable step to get the CD as going concern which is...

  5. CIRP - dues of EPF - The law as it exists today does not oblige the IRP/RP to send any information to any creditor or statutory authority even if the records of the...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the decision to exclude the Appellant and other unsecured Financial Creditors from the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The key issues were...

  7. Recovery of Fee payable to Resolution Professional from the Income Tax Department and the Excise and Taxation Department of state - Appellants (revenue authorities)...

  8. The NCLAT upheld the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor (Respondent No.1) for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It held...

  9. Initiation of CIRP - Financial creditor within the meaning of sub-section (7) of Section 5 of the IBC - The Supreme Court affirmed the NCLAT’s judgment, holding that the...

  10. CIRP process - We are not convinced with the argument that amended Sub-Section (4) of Section 30 requires only Secured Financial Creditors to contribute towards interim...

  11. CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

  12. Disqualification of a director of the financial creditor to sign the Section 7 application was challenged. The application u/s 7, signed by the director of the financial...

  13. CIRP - Home Buyers - Financial Creditors or not - scope of Financial Debt - The appellants are declared as financial creditors within the meaning of Section 5(8)(f)...

  14. Section 53(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides for the order of priority in the distribution of liquidation assets. Financial debts owed to unsecured...

  15. CIRP proceedings - on the basis of parity being deployed by the RP in admitting claims of both category of financial creditors, there remains no reason to be aggrieved....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates