Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2021 Year 2021 This

Dishonor of Cheque - The presumption under Section 139 is a ...


Accused Successfully Rebuts Presumption u/s 139 in Cheque Dishonor Case; Complainant Fails to Prove Debt Validity.

December 7, 2021

Case Laws     Indian Laws     HC

Dishonor of Cheque - The presumption under Section 139 is a rebuttable presumption and the onus is on the accused to raise the probable defence. The standard of proof for rebutting the presumption is that of preponderance of probabilities. In the instant case, the accused has succeeded in rebutting the presumption, showing preponderance of probability by leading evidence and hence, onus shifts upon the complainant to prove otherwise, however, the complainant has failed to prove that the cheque was drawn towards legally enforceable debt as neither any account nor any details of amount paid by the complainant is submitted by the complainant before the trial Court. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Kerala High Court dealt with a case involving dishonor of cheques u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court considered joint trial of cases, material...

  2. In a case concerning dishonor of cheques u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Court upheld the conviction and sentence. The accused admitted issuing cheques...

  3. Dishonor of Cheque - acquittal of accused - Privity of Contract - The complainant has not made out a case and the presumption was rebutted by the accused in effectively...

  4. Dishonor of Cheque - cheque on presentation was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds - acquittal of the accused - Once signature, execution and handing over of the...

  5. Dishonor of Cheque - acquittal of the accused - rebuttal of presumption - legally enforceable debt or not - The complainant has failed to establish his financial...

  6. The case involved a dispute regarding the dishonour of cheques, with the key issue being whether the Respondent had a legal obligation to pay back the money under the...

  7. Dishonor of Cheque - Accused took a specific defence that the cheque in question was obtained by the complainant by exercising force and that the same was a blank cheque....

  8. Dishonor of Cheque - insufficient fund - preponderance of probabilities - In view of such statements made by the complainant at the time of her cross-examination, there...

  9. The High Court considered a case involving dishonour of cheque due to insufficiency of funds, determining if a legally enforceable debt existed. The accused was...

  10. Dishonor of Cheque - It is clear that the accused need not enter the witness box to rebut the presumption. However, such presumption of law cannot be considered as...

  11. Presumption u/ss 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not properly applied by the Trial Court. When presumption u/s 139 is raised, the onus shifts to the...

  12. The accused successfully rebutted the mandatory presumption u/s 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by raising a probable defence and bringing in suspicious...

  13. Dishonor of Cheque - presumption of debt - when the complainant himself comes up with a document to establish the existing debt or liability, the question of raising...

  14. Dishonour of Cheque - Rebuttal of presumption - Financial Capacity - misuse of Cheque by the complainant - The High Codurt noted that the Learned Trial Court rightly...

  15. The Calcutta High Court ruled on a case involving dishonour of a cheque due to insufficient funds. The accused was acquitted as the complainant failed to prove money...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates