Absolute Confiscation - import of shoes - mis-declaration of the ...

Imported Shoes Confiscated for Mis-declaration; Violates IPR u/r 6 and Section 11, Seizure Upheld u/s 111(l.

December 8, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

Absolute Confiscation - import of shoes - mis-declaration of the goods in terms of quantity and value - the impugned goods have violated the IPR and the import of these goods was, therefore, prohibited under Rule 6 read with Section 11. - As the seizure of the goods and suspension of the clearance was based on the IPR already registered with the Customs, it is covered under Rule 7(1)(a) and not under Rule 7(1)(b). - confiscation of these goods under section 111(l) in the order of the original authority affirmed in the impugned order is correct and proper - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Absolute Confiscation - import of shoes - mis-declaration of the ...

Imported Shoes Confiscated for Mis-declaration; Violates IPR u/r 6 and Section 11, Seizure Upheld u/s 111(l.

December 8, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Confiscation of goods and levy of penalty - Import of Pair of Shoes - mis-declaration/suppression in the import documents - Non-compliance of the provisions of the IPR...

Mis-declaration of goods - import of PLC Splitter Module - Merely because the appellant sought for duty exemption on the belief that the goods imported by him fall...

The appellant imported goods declared as 'Low Aromatic White Spirit' classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2710 1990, while the adjudicating authority...

Classification dispute involving imported SVPS Chillers - whether to be classified under CTH 84198940 or not, and eligibility for exemption notification dated 17.03.2012....

Seeking re-export of goods - Absolute confiscation of goods - breach of ‘intellectual property rights’ - The tribunal found that while the goods were correctly...

The appellant imported capital goods under an EPCG (Export Promotion Capital Goods) license issued by the DGFT (Directorate General of Foreign Trade). The department...

Mis declaration of Goods – goods arrived by post parcel will not liable for confiscation u/s 111(l) and 111(m) - the penalty imposed u/s 112(a) on the assessee was also...

Enhancement of value - old and used worn clothing, completely fumigated - Confiscation - The Tribunal referred to a previous case where it was observed that Section...

The CESTAT held that the customs authorities lacked the legal authority to impose duty liability or confiscate the salvage equipment imported for the MSC Chitra incident....

Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - Misdeclaration of quantity and value of imported goods - the goods were found to be in excess of the entry made i.e. the bill...

Import of IPR - Duty of customs or service tax - Import of imported drawings and designs along with the plant and machinery and capital goods - levy of service tax upheld - AT

Levy of ADD - imported stainless steel CR Coils having width less than 1280 mm - The act of re-export of the goods subsequent to import by mis-declaring/non-declaring...

Confiscation under Sec. 111(d) & 111(f) - Declaration of palm oil as crude palm oil - The Collector has not specified in his order as to what is the deficiency in the...

Confiscation – Under section 111(m) of Custom Act., 2002 - mis-declaration was of no consequence in evading customs duty. - the mis-declaration was of a trivial nature....

Container storage charges - The High Court upheld the decision of the single judge, stating that since the goods were indeed confiscated by customs authorities while in...

Quick Updates: