Time Limitation - suppression of fact of manufacture and ...

Case Laws Central Excise

December 11, 2021

Time Limitation - suppression of fact of manufacture and clearance of excisable goods - It is found that satisfaction recorded initially by the Commissioner and then by the Tribunal as regards the intention of appellant to evade payment of central excise duty is without any supporting material on record - The substantial question of law as framed is answered by holding that the Tribunal was not justified in law and in facts in holding that the demand under the show cause notice was not barred by limitation. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Time Limitation - suppression of fact of manufacture and ...

Case Laws Central Excise

December 11, 2021

You may also like:

Denial of exemption benefits under Notifications 30/2004-CE and 23/2003-CE for clearances of finished goods into the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) by a 100% Export Oriented...

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing SS Hose Assembly, Flange & Fittings, also procured MS Round, TMT Bars, etc., performed work on them, and cleared them to buyers...

The case involved a dispute regarding availing CENVAT credit for construction services used in building housing units for staff. The tribunal held that the construction...

CENVAT credit of service tax utilized for the payment of Central Excise duty at the time of clearance and manufacture of excisable goods - pre deposit waived - AT

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed issues regarding the invocation of the extended period of limitation due to suppression of facts leading to denial of CENVAT...

Extended period of limitation - The very fact that the appellant is contesting the issue of invoking larger period of limitation, that the rendering of service under the...

Extended period of limitation - no suppression of facts - the Tribunal was justified in reversing the finding to the effect that the process of manufacture had not been...

SSI Exemption - value of clearances - clubbing of clearances - The tribunal found the appellants engaged in the manufacture and sale of excisable goods without Central...

Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The returns contained all the requisite details as that of the invoice numbers, the amount of invoice, the...

Screening of Iron Ore - Manufacture - if no manufacturing activity has taken place, mere mention of the goods in the tariff will not make the said goods as excisable goods - AT

Confiscation of raw material - scope of Rule 25 - Besides, the use of the word ‘any’ before the word excisable goods, in the said clause, makes it more clear and points...

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

Extended period of Limitation - suppression of facts or not - The Tribunal observes that the dispute revolves around the classification of taxable services, which...

Process amounting to manufacture - Classification of goods - Sulphur – 90% WG with the brand name of CosavetFertis, which is said to be used as fertilizer - there is no...

SSI Exemption - clubbing of clearances - in absence of substantial evidences of manufacturing and clearances of the goods brought on record by revenue, it cannot be...

Quick Updates: