Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - No evidence is on ...

Customs Mis-declaration Case: FOB vs. CIF Valuation Dispute u/r 10 of Valuation Rules, 2007; No Justified Confiscation.

December 21, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - No evidence is on record that the any payment over and above the contracted, and declared, price was made to the seller. The allegation hinges on the said transaction price being on Free on Board (FOB) terms while duties of customs are to be computed on value appraised on Cost Insurance Freight (CIF) terms. The authority for adoption of the base arises from rule 10 of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 which is not a consequence of rejection of declared value attended upon by re-determination through rule 4 to rule 9 of the said Rules. Recourse to confiscation under section 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962 is, therefore, not tenable in law. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - No evidence is on ...

Customs Mis-declaration Case: FOB vs. CIF Valuation Dispute u/r 10 of Valuation Rules, 2007; No Justified Confiscation.

December 21, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Valuation of imported goods - non & mis- declaration - adjudicating authority has not recorded the reason as to why he has resorted to the valuation under Rule 7 without...

Valuation - Enhancement of value of the imported RPO - CESTAT held that, in the present case neither any contemporaneous value was adopted nor any method as prescribed...

Dispute regarding valuation of imported goods under Customs Valuation Rules. Related parties involved, 10% loading applied to transaction value earlier. New Customs...

Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

The appeal challenges the revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed for alleged violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(n)...

Entry No. 10 of Notification No. 10/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 was challenged as ultra-vires the IGST Act and Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution,...

Valuation of goods - old and used self-propelled platform supply vessel Sagar Fortune - The justification offered for invoking rule 12 of Customs Valuation...

Adjudication of a customs duty dispute involving the import of cars and the determination of the 'transaction value' u/s 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The key points are:...

Method of valuation - Rule 11 is adopted when the situation is not covered by any of the other methods of valuation prescribed from Rule 4 to 10A. The method of...

The High Court ruled on the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, which was challenged as being ultra vires...

Eligibility to claim refund of IGST - The availing exemption under Notification No.79/2017-Cus dated 13.10.2017 in respect of additional duty of Customs under...

Valuation - inclusion of 'demurrage' and 'dispatch' money - Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 10 of the Customs Valuation Rules, held as to be bad and hence declared ultra vires the...

CESTAT ruled on classification dispute regarding Light Green Float Glass imports. The appellant sought classification under CTI 7005 10 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975,...

Customs broker filed shipping bills with incorrect classification intentionally to obtain higher MEIS benefits, violating Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of CBLR 2018. Held:...

Appellant challenged inclusion of royalty and cost of advertisement incurred in India in assessable value of imported goods u/rs 10(1)(c) and 10(1)(e) of Customs...

Quick Updates: