Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2021 Year 2021 This

Clandestine removal of the finished excisable goods - No ...


Revenue's Allegations Fall Short: Insufficient Evidence of Unlawful Removal of Excisable Goods Lacks Tangible Proof.

December 24, 2021

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine removal of the finished excisable goods - No positive independent tangible evidence have been produced by the Revenue to substantiate the statements recorded during investigation and the entries made in the private documents which are undoubtedly unsigned, bearing no indication in any form that they relate to the appellant No.1 - specific description of the finished excisable goods alleged to have been clandestinely removed are also not found mentioned on the unsigned handwritten loose private records/documents - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine removal - evasion of duty - clearance of branded Khaini - burden to prove on Revenue - Ultimately, the High court concurred with the majority view of the...

  2. Clandestine Removal - clandestine removal is a serious charge and requires to be substantiated by evidence encompassing various activities in the chain of events. - The...

  3. Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

  4. Clandestine removal - The standard of evidences need not be as high as in criminal proceedings, where the charges are required to be established beyond reasonable doubts....

  5. Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

  6. Clandestine removal - Shortage of raw material and finished goods - no verification at the buyer/supplier’s end conducted by the Revenue - mere payment of duty on the...

  7. Clandestine removal - suppression of production - Merely deposit of money at the time of investigation would not amount to acceptance of allegations of clandestine...

  8. 100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

  9. Clandestine Removal of goods - Revenue cannot build its case based upon the theoretical percentage calculation of waste generated, without production of any evidence to...

  10. Clandestine removal - job-work - even if there is an oral evidence in the form of a statement, it requires to be corroborated by documentary evidence - there are no such...

  11. CESTAT allowed the appeal against allegations of clandestine production and removal of sponge iron. Revenue's case relied solely on theoretical input-output ratios...

  12. Clandestine removal - on the basis of third party records - As Revenue has failed to produce any supporting evidence in their favour, therefore, the charge of...

  13. Clandestine removal and under valuation - private records - presumption - The Revenue has miserably failed to produce corroboration evidence on records so as to...

  14. Business Auxiliary services - Commission agent - they were out-rightly purchasing and selling the goods - allegation made by the Revenue is only a bald allegation...

  15. Levy of penalty u/r 26 on the Director of the company - Allegation of Clandestine removal of goods - The Tribunal observed that the statement of an employee, admitting...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates