Refund claim - Adjustment of amount against outstanding demand - ...

Tax Authority Violated Section 245: Adjusted Refunds Without Notice, Exceeding 20% Limit, Entitling Petitioner to Refund.

December 30, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Refund claim - Adjustment of amount against outstanding demand - Refunds have been adjusted against the outstanding tax demand by the Authority without following the procedure prescribed under Section 245 of the Act, inasmuch as no notice or opportunity of pre-decisional hearing had been provided to the Petitioner prior to such adjustment of refund in excess of 20% - the Petitioner is entitled to refund of adjustments made in excess of 20% of the disputed tax demands. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - Adjustment of amount against outstanding demand - ...

Tax Authority Violated Section 245: Adjusted Refunds Without Notice, Exceeding 20% Limit, Entitling Petitioner to Refund.

December 30, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Refund of adjustments made in excess of 20% of the disputed tax demands - s per mandate of law as well as the fact that refunds have been adjusted against outstanding...

Revised monetary limits for adjudication of show cause notices in Central Excise for commodities classified under Chapter 24 of Schedule IV (tobacco and tobacco...

Addition u/s 40A(3) - Cash expenditure - assessee has made payments to the land owners exceeding INR 20,000/- - The Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument to some...

Refund adjustments against disputed tax demands - Non invoking Section 245 - no notice or opportunity of pre-decisional hearing had been provided to the petitioner prior...

The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

Time limit for issue of Notice - Customs Broker - "Issue of Notice" versus "Service of Notice" - The word ‘issue’ in regulation 17 of the 2018 Regulations or regulation...

The High Court held that the Revenue's decision to adjust the refund due to the petitioner for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2017-18 against the stayed demand for the...

Important advisory for e-Invoice for Taxpayers having annual turnover exceeding ₹ 20 Crores - SGST

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Dishonour of Cheque - interim compensation u/s 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act - The Act provides the discretion to the court for granting interim compensation not...

The circular addresses the Reduction of Government Litigation by setting monetary limits for filing appeals before GSTAT, High Courts, and Supreme Court. It refers to...

The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

Stay of demand - pre-deposit of only 20% of the disputed demand - adjustments of refunds against demand - respondent is entitled to seek pre-deposit of only 20% of the...

Rectification application - Validity of Garnishee Notices for recovery of tax - contention of the writ petitioners that the Garnishee Notices had come to be issued even...

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the show-cause notice dated 20.08.2024 issued by the respondent authority in relation to the refund of integrated taxes...

Quick Updates: