Review order - Maintainability of appeal - since all the ...

Appeal Dismissed: No Apparent Error in NCLT Order; Review Application Found Lacking Merit Due to Petitioner's Absence.

January 21, 2022

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy HC

Review order - Maintainability of appeal - since all the impugned orders had been passed in the absence of the petitioner, who failed to avail the opportunity of being represented before the NCLT, there is extremely limited scope of entering into the nitty-gritties of such factual allegations within the constraints of the writ jurisdiction. - The order under review cannot be subjected to a review on the ground of error apparent on the face of the record, simply because there is no such apparent error in the impugned order which can be decided at the first blush without looking into the materials annexed to the writ petition and the connected records of the proceeding before the NCLT - there is no merit in the review application. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Review order - Maintainability of appeal - since all the ...

Appeal Dismissed: No Apparent Error in NCLT Order; Review Application Found Lacking Merit Due to Petitioner's Absence.

January 21, 2022

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy HC

You may also like:

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

Review petition dismissed for lack of grounds permissible under law. Court found no mistake or error apparent on record to warrant review of the impugned order passed...

Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification...

Rectification of mistake - ITAT has allows appeal on merit & dismissed the assessee’s cross objections as infructuous regarding re-opening of assessment. Assesse not...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - In the present case, in four months, around 121 days come, and the appeal was filed on 121st day. The appellate authority should...

CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee's appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to...

CIT(A) dismissed appeal ex-parte. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order and remanded matter to dispose appeal on merits, holding CIT(A) obligated to decide appeal on merits even...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

Maintainability of appeal - appeal dismissed on the ground of time limitation - non-submission of the certified copy. - Despite discrepancies raised by the respondent...

The review petition filed u/s 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any mistake or...

Rectification of certain errors apparent on face of order denied in AAR ruling. AR contended AAR should have ruled on all queries. Held: No error apparent on record...

Exercise of jurisdiction erroneously - Erroneous application of provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 - Validity of assessment orders - Institutional...

The court examined whether the application filed by the State Bank of India against the personal guarantor u/s 95 was barred by limitation. It was held that even if no...

The Adjudicating Authority erred by dismissing the Section 95 application without appointing a Resolution Professional and following the statutory process under the...

Seeking review - error apparent on the face of record or not - The High Court held that, these documents were not part of the pleadings. Review does not mean rehearing...

Quick Updates: