Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2022 Year 2022 This

TP Adjustment - classification of the assessee as a KPO by ...


Assessee Misclassified as KPO; DRP and TPO's ALP Determination Deemed Incorrect Due to Insufficient Evidence.

January 28, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

TP Adjustment - classification of the assessee as a KPO by applying safe harbor Rules - classification of the assessee as a KPO by applying safe harbor Rules is totally out of context and does not get any support from the evidences before us. Therefore, the directions of the DRP as well as the observations made by the TPO and thereafter comparing the assessee company with that of high end KPO for benchmarking ALP determination of the comparables is not correct. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. There is inconsistency in adjudicating the assessee's functional profile. The Tribunal treated the assessee as TPO/KPO for certain years but as a non-KPO/ITeS for...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  3. Comparable selection - Tribunal remanded issue of inclusion of companies to TPO to examine functional comparability after applying applicable filters. If functionally...

  4. Transfer pricing adjustments, selection of the most appropriate method (MAM), benchmarking approach (aggregation or segregation), factual rendering of services, arm's...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered a case involving Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment where the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) determined the Arm's Length Price...

  6. TP Adjustment - determination of arm’s length price, ALP - Transactions with the local vendors the terms of which are not influenced by Comer SpA cannot be treated as...

  7. TP Adjustment - Determination of arm’s-length price - Law does not permit the TPO or DRP to determine the arm’s length price on estimation or adhoc basis. - Accordingly...

  8. Transfer pricing - determination of ALP - selection of MAM - application of CUP method as against TNMM - AO/TPO directed first apply CUP using some comparable instances...

  9. TP Adjustment - ALP is determined by TPO by not applying any method at all or by choosing a method which is not prescribed u/s.92C(1) of the Act, then such a...

  10. The ITAT held that the TPO erred in deeming international transactions and determining arm's length price (ALP) for the period after cessation/expiry of the service...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment for management service fee paid to Associated Enterprises. It was held that the...

  12. TP Adjustment - selection of MAM - RPM or TNMM or Profit Split method [PSM] - Assessee has came out with a contention that if the TNMM is to be applied, then its...

  13. Most appropriate method for determining the ALP of the royalty - Transfer of intangibles - matter remitted back to the AO/TPO for determination of ALP of royalty by...

  14. Determination of Arm’s Length Price – In the guise of determination of ALP, the TPO cannot question the business decision of payment and determine that no services were...

  15. The case pertains to the levy of penalty u/s 271G for failure to furnish documents and information u/ss 92CA/92D. The key points are: The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates