Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2022 Year 2022 This

Once the application of Part II is taken away for debts more ...


High Court Clarifies Tribunal Jurisdiction: IBC Amendments Apply Prospectively for Debts Over Rs. 1 Crore, Not Retroactively.

February 11, 2022

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy     HC

Once the application of Part II is taken away for debts more than ₹ 1 Crore, there is no further jurisdiction available under the Statute to the NCLT to act as an Adjudicating Authority under the IBC. It is hence a clear case of total want of jurisdiction - In Ext. P9 order, the Tribunal has held that the notification dated 24.03.2020 is prospective in nature and it is not retrospective or retro-active in nature. It is further stated by the Tribunal that notification will not apply to pending applications before the concerned Adjudicating Authority under the IBC prior to the issuance of the aforesaid notification. - The Tribunal has gone wrong in its interpretation of Section 4 of the Act. Section 4, after amendment on 24.3.2020 clearly says that Part II of the IBC shall apply to matters relating to the insolvency and liquidation of corporate debtors where the minimum amount of default is ₹ 1 Crore. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Maintainability of Section 7 application under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for non-payment of debt analyzed. Financial contract not mandatory for establishing...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Section 7 application filed by the Appellant, ruling that the share application money deposited by the Appellant with the Corporate...

  3. Reassessment of the Bill of Entry - dues are within the Operational debt under IBC or not - Though the definition of “Operational Debt” in Section 5(21) of the IBC, 2016...

  4. Maintainability of an application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The key points are:...

  5. NCLAT determined that interest claims of Rs. 1,16,25,700.82 based solely on invoice provisions were not enforceable under IBC without formal agreement. The principal...

  6. CIRP - Partnership Form - The court examined the definitions under the IBC and noted that it does not include partnership firms or their directors as corporate debtors....

  7. Initiation of CIRP - Existence of a financial debt - Assignment of debt- The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the Adjudicating Authority’s findings, agreeing that: The...

  8. Contempt proceedings - The Tribunal (NCLT) and the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have the same ‘jurisdiction’, ‘powers’ and ‘Authority’ in respect of contempt of it as the...

  9. Corporate debtor defaulted in repaying financial debt owed to financial creditor. NCLAT dismissed appeal, upholding orders of adjudicating authority. Transaction...

  10. No reduction in approval of resolution plans after enactment of IBC (Amendment) Ordinance 2017

  11. Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case...

  12. This legal summary concerns the maintainability of a Section 7 application for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor....

  13. Initiation of CIRP - It is to be remembered that IBC, 2016 is not a ‘Debt Enforcement Procedure’ - the ‘proceedings’ under IBC are summary in nature and not an adversary...

  14. The SC held that penalties imposed by the NCDRC are regulatory in nature and do not constitute "debt" under the IBC. The moratorium under Section 96 of IBC does not...

  15. Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) (Amendment) Rules, 2022 - Notification

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates